Reports on atrocities in the districts of Yalova and Guemlek and in the Ismid Peninsula : $b Presented to Parliament by command of His MajestyInter-Allied Commission of Enquiry into Atrocities in Yalova and Guemlek
History
Reports on atrocities in the districts of Yalova and Guemlek and in the Ismid Peninsula : $b Presented to Parliament by command of His Majesty
Inter-Allied Commission of Enquiry into Atrocities in Yalova and Guemlek
Greco-Turkish War, 1921-1922 -- Atrocities
The kaïmakam asked the commission to evacuate the Turkish population to
a place of safety. On leaving the Greek headquarters, the commission
found the Greek refugees raving with anger. The reason for this was that
Hafiz Ahmet (one of the guides of the commission and also one of the
chief men of a neighbouring village, who had gone ashore that morning
with the commission) had been accused by some Greek women of having been
implicated in various massacres which had taken place in the
neighbourhood. It was with the very greatest difficulty, and only by
turning the attention of the crowd on another point, that he was enabled
to enter a boat and return on board. He was pursued by a howling crowd,
which even entered the water while the boat was pushing off with all
speed.
At 2·30 the “Bryony” anchored at Chinejik and the commission at once
went ashore. The Turkish quarter was quite empty, but not destroyed. The
mosque had been looted, but not burned, and no traces were found of the
horrible massacres reported as having taken place at this spot.
The Greek priest showed the commission freshly-turned Turkish graves.
The “Bryony” then left for Enguri. When the commission went ashore, it
was received by the officer commanding the Greek detachment. As far as
he knew, only brigandage had taken place in the neighbourhood.
The commission then made for the twin villages of Kojadereh, which were
entirely destroyed. There were no inhabitants and no bodies were found;
no information was obtained.
The commission returned to the “Bryony,” which remained at anchor off
shore all night.
_May 22._—Returned at 8·30 and arrived at Top-Haneh, Constantinople.
_Report of the Ismid Commission of Enquiry._
To His Excellency,
The British High Commissioner, Constantinople.
Your Excellency,
_Constantinople, June 1, 1921._
We have the honour to submit the following report in accordance with
your instructions and with the terms of reference for the above-named
Commission of Enquiry:—
1. Credible evidence has been produced as to crimes committed during the
last twelve months by both Greeks and Turks. There is no doubt that
there have been a large number of atrocities in the Ismid peninsula, and
it appears that those on the part of the Turks have been more
considerable and ferocious than those on the part of the Greeks.
We attach a résumé of our investigations upon which our opinions are
based; and will prepare a schedule giving full details.
2. The present state of affairs is largely due to racial feeling and
age-long vendetta, now fanned to an intense pitch by exaggerated stories
which promote fear and excitement.
3. Greek regular troops have been implicated in recent excesses, and
both officers and soldiers; more especially lately when the troops have
been on the march.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account