Revolutionary Europe, 1789-1815Stephens, H. Morse (Henry Morse)
History
Revolutionary Europe, 1789-1815
Stephens, H. Morse (Henry Morse)
Europe -- History -- 1789-1815
Nor must the influence of intellectual ideas, as bearing on problems
which the French Revolution was to force on the attention of the more
backward and more oppressed nations of Europe, be underrated. The
great French writers of the eighteenth century—Voltaire, Montesquieu,
Diderot, and Rousseau—had been deeply impregnated with the ideas of
Locke and the English political thinkers of his school. In their
different lines they insisted that government existed for the good
of the governed, and investigated the origins of government and the
relations of man in the social state. It was their speculations which
altered the character of absolute monarchy and based its retention on
its benevolent purposes; they, too, insisted upon the rights of man to
preserve his personal freedom, as long as it did not clash with the
maintenance and security of civil society. The great French writers of
the eighteenth century exercised by their works a smaller influence on
the outbreak and actual course of the French Revolution than has been
generally supposed. The causes of the movement were chiefly economical
and political, not philosophical or social: its rapid development was
due to historical circumstances, and mainly to the attitude of the
rest of Europe. But the text-books of its leaders were the works of
the French thinkers of the eighteenth century, and if their doctrines
had little actual influence in bringing about the Revolution, they
influenced its development and the extension of its principles
throughout Europe. It is curious to contrast the opinions of the great
French writers of the middle of the eighteenth century, whose arguments
mainly affected the general conceptions of man living in society,
that is, of government, with the views advocated by the great German
writers of the end of the century, who concentrated their attention
upon man in his individual capacity for culture and self-improvement.
Schiller, Goethe, Kant, and Herder were, further, more cosmopolitan
than German. The problems of man and his intellectual and artistic
development proved more attractive to the great German thinkers than
the difficulties presented by the economical, social, and political
diversities of different classes of society. Goethe, for instance,
understood the signification of the French Revolution, and was much
interested in its effects on the human race, but he cared very little
about its impression on Germany.
[Sidenote: Morality and Religion in the eighteenth century.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account