Right and wrong in MassachusettsChapman, Maria Weston
History
Right and wrong in Massachusetts
Chapman, Maria Weston
Antislavery movements -- Massachusetts -- Boston; Massachusetts Anti-slavery Society
With the fullest charity for all conscientious scruples, and
dissenting, as I do, from the peace-views of the Liberator, I
cannot see how their discussion, conducted in a Christian spirit,
and with sincere love of truth, can offend the conscience of any
man. Limited to a brief space, as it is, it can have no effect
on the general character of the paper. I mean to give all my
influence, (and, in this crisis, when the paper so much needs
its friends, I wish that influence were greater,) to gain it the
confidence, and pour its spirit into the mind of every one I can
reach. I shall esteem it a privilege to second your efforts. The
danger I most dread is, to have our cause fall under the control
of any party, sect, or profession. That way ruin lies. The
chiefest bulwark against it, I know of, is the Liberator. Success
to it. May it have the cordial support of every abolition heart.
Yours, truly,
WENDELL PHILLIPS.
Boston, Jan. 7th, 1839.
Troubles, however different in their nature, always seem to have
fellowship with each other. At this juncture, while the Anti-Slavery
community in Massachusetts were laboring under the pain and
astonishment of the recent development, came a Sub-Committee,
consisting of Mr. Leavitt and Mr. Stanton, from New York, to say that,
as the stated payments due to the National Treasury were unpaid, the
contract became null and void.[4]
The Massachusetts Board could not, as lawyers, or as men of business,
admit this to be the case; but, anxious to discharge the obligation,
they came to the following resolution, in the presence of the New York
Committee.
“Resolved, That the Executive Committee be invited to send their
agents into the State, and take any other measures they may
deem best, to collect the amount due on the pledge made by this
society, and to become due on the first of February, and to remit
the whole to the treasury of the Massachusetts Society, under the
promise that the same shall be _immediately_ and _wholly_ remitted
to New York; and that in the collection of the same, they be
authorised to receive the amount of pledges hitherto made to the
Massachusetts Society.”
They hoped, by this, to open a way for the instant redemption of the
pledge, through the means of the friendly co-operation of the New York
Committee, and trusted that the rash, unbusiness-like and unbrotherly
nullification of so necessary an arrangement, would be avoided.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account