Robert Fulton and the SubmarineParsons, William Barclay
History
Robert Fulton and the Submarine
Parsons, William Barclay
Fulton, Robert, 1765-1815; Submarines (Ships)
Delpeuch asks what were the reasons that prevented use being made of the
Nautilus or at least from trying it, and in answering his own question
says that it is a mystery that has been impossible to clear away. There
was no mystery. All innovations, and perhaps particularly so in
connection with ships, have been forced on the world against the
opposition of those to be directly benefited. It was so with Fulton’s
submarine, and later with his steamboat. The change from side wheels to
propellers, the use of metal for hulls, the introduction of watertight
bulkheads and the elimination of sails were all adopted only after long
delay and strong antagonism, due to the same official and unreasoning
opposition.
Realization of defeat came slowly to Fulton, and was all the more bitter
because it came so. He returned to Paris from Brest elated by his
success in demonstrating the value of the improvements to his previous
design. He expected to be notified immediately that his offer had been
accepted. As the days passed without word from Bonaparte, certainty of
victory first gave way to doubt, then doubt to hope, and finally hope
was changed to despair. In his impatience he wrote a personal letter to
Bonaparte. This letter dated 19 Fructidor an IX (16 Sept., 1801) urging
and begging favorable action is still preserved in the Archives
Nationales at Paris.
Bonaparte made no reply.
He had made up his mind to travel the road that led to St. Helena.
Although he gave Fulton no answer, it is reported that he spoke of
Fulton as being a charlatan and a swindler, intent only on extorting
money.
There is one piece of evidence showing that Bonaparte subsequently
regretted his action and realized the value that Fulton and his
inventions might have been to him. Desbrière in his book entitled
“1793–1805, Projets et Tentatives de Débarquement aux Iles
Britanniques,” quotes a letter written on July 21st to M. de Champagny,
at that time Counsellor of State in the Marine department:[4]
I have just read the proposition of Citizen Fulton that you have sent
to me much too late _to permit it to change the face of the world_.
However I desire that you will immediately refer its examination to a
commission composed of members chosen from the different classes of
the Institute. It is there that the wisdom of Europe should seek
judges to solve the problem in question. As soon as the report is made
it will be transmitted to you and you will send it to me. Be sure that
this will not take more than a week.
Desbrière states that the year when this letter was written is commonly
put down as 1804. But he points out that in July of that year Fulton was
in England and Champagny in Austria. The year was probably 1803, because
in July, 1803, Fulton was exhibiting a steam-propelled boat on the
Seine, concerning which innovation an official of the Navy department
would undoubtedly have informed the First Consul.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account