Roger Williams, Prophet and Pioneer of Soul-LibertyStrickland, Arthur Barsazou
Religion
Roger Williams, Prophet and Pioneer of Soul-Liberty
Strickland, Arthur Barsazou
Williams, Roger, 1604?-1683
[Illustration: Sir Edward Coke Courtesy of “Providence Magazine”]
In 1629, we find him at High Laves, Essex, not far from Chelmesford,
where Thomas Hooker, later the founder of Hartford Colony, was
minister. Here he also met John Cotton. Men’s views at that time were
changing. The people of the Established Church were divided into three
classes. One stood by the Established Order in all things; another
class of Puritans sought to stay by the Church, but aimed to purify the
movement; the third class was for absolute separation. Williams, with
hundreds of others, was disturbed. The anger of Lady Barrington and the
suspicions of Archbishop Laud started a persecution which drove him out
of England. He said:
I was persecuted in and out of my father’s house. Truly it was as
bitter as death to me when Bishop Laud pursued me out of the land,
and my conscience was persuaded against the national church, and
ceremonies and bishops.... I say, it was as bitter as death to me when
I rode Windsor way to take ship at Bristol.
Many years later he wrote:
He (God) knows what gains and preferments I have refused in
universities, city, country, and court in old England, and something
in New England, to keep my soul undefiled in this point and not to act
with a doubting conscience.
Before leaving England, he was married. The only information we have
in regard to his wife, up to that time, is that her name was Mary
Warned. They sailed on the ship Lyon, from Bristol, England, December
1, 1630. After a tempestuous journey of sixty-six days they arrived off
Nantasket, February 5, 1631. Judge Durfee speaks thus of this flight:
He was obliged to fly or dissemble his convictions, and for him, as
for all noblest natures, a life of transparent truthfulness was alone
an instinct and a necessity. This absolute sincerity is the key to
his character, as it was always the mainspring of his conduct. It was
this which led him to reject indignantly the compromises with his
conscience which from time to time were proposed to him. It was this
which impelled him when he discovered a truth to proclaim it, when he
detected an error to expose it, when he saw an evil, to try and remedy
it, and when he could do a good, even to his enemies, to do it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account