Roman Public LifeGreenidge, A. H. J. (Abel Hendy Jones)
History
Roman Public Life
Greenidge, A. H. J. (Abel Hendy Jones)
Constitutional history -- Rome; Rome -- Politics and government
Meanwhile the provisional government drifted on. It won military
successes; it was gradually building up a hegemony in Italy. But the
effect of war now, as at an earlier period, was ruinous to those to whom
this government had to look for support. In spite of the palliative
measures of pay for the army and occasional land distribution, a large
portion of the yeoman farmers were again in a pitiable state. We cannot
now speak of the social grievances of Plebeians as a whole; those members
of the Plebs who began to occupy the benches of the Senate,[452] and
who aspired to the military tribunate or quaestorship, were as wealthy
as their patrician compeers. The race for office was keen between the
members of the two orders. The Patrician had now to beg for his place on
the curule chair. The first law against canvassing (_ambitus_) was passed
in 432; it prohibited a candidate from whitening his toga with chalk
before the elections[453]—a primitive measure, but one which shows that
the plebeian electorate had at last become a power. But though isolated
members of the Plebs were soaring into the upper regions, the mass of
this body still consisted of bankrupt agriculturists. The situation
which they regarded as desperate was, apart from the harsh law of debt,
the normal condition of a modern proletariate. But the ideal of the
ancient citizen was higher than our own; they wished to be proprietors of
freehold land or of land held on an undisturbed tenure from the state.
This discontent was the opportunity of the richer Plebeians,[454] who
wished to secure perfect political equality between the orders. In
378 loud cries were raised against the capitalists; a war with the
Volsci gave the tribunes the chance of impeding the military levy, and
some temporary concessions to debtors were unwillingly wrung from the
government.[455] When the next year saw the burdens reimposed, two
ambitious Plebeians, L. Sextius and C. Licinius Stolo, came forward
with the proposition that the only sure way of permanently remedying
the evils of the lower class was by securing one of the places in the
consulship to members of their own order. They formulated a programme
which was an attractive jumble of social and political measures. The
_plebiscitum_ which they promulgated promised a temporary relief from
debt, proposed a limit to the amount of public land which any individual
might possess, and declared that the military tribunate should be
abolished, the consulship should be restored, and that one of the two
consuls _must_ henceforth be a Plebeian. This comprehensive measure,
which attacked land, capital, and office,[456] was easily met. The two
tribunes stood alone, and their eight colleagues were without difficulty
induced to put their veto on the revolutionary measure. But it was
soon shown that, if the veto might be used against the interest of the
Plebs, the negative powers of the tribunes might be employed, with as
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account