England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century -- Fiction
After we had worked away about an hour at the bureau, her ladyship said
we had done enough for one day; and as the time was come for her
afternoon ride, she left me, with a volume of engravings from Mr.
Hogarth’s pictures on one side of me (I don’t like to write down the
names of them, though my lady thought nothing of it, I am sure), and
upon a stand her great prayer-book open at the evening-psalms for the
day, on the other. But as soon as she was gone, I troubled myself little
with either, but amused myself with looking round the room at my
leisure. The side on which the fire-place stood, was all panelled,--part
of the old ornaments of the house, for there was an Indian paper with
birds and beasts, and insects on it, on all the other sides. There were
coats of arms, of the various families with whom the Hanburys had
intermarried, all over these panels, and up and down the ceiling as
well. There was very little looking-glass in the room, though one of the
great drawing-rooms was called the “Mirror Room,” because it was lined
with glass, which my lady’s great-grandfather had brought from Venice
when he was ambassador there. There were china jars of all shapes and
sizes round and about the room, and some china monsters, or idols, of
which I could never bear the sight, they were so ugly, though I think my
lady valued them more than all. There was a thick carpet on the middle
of the floor, which was made of small pieces of rare wood fitted into a
pattern; the doors were opposite to each other, and were composed of two
heavy tall wings, and opened in the middle, moving on brass grooves
inserted into the floor--they would not have opened over a carpet. There
were two windows reaching up nearly to the ceiling, but very narrow, and
with deep window-seats in the thickness of the wall. The room was full
of scent, partly from the flowers outside, and partly from the great
jars of pot-pourri inside. The choice of odours was what my lady piqued
herself upon, saying nothing showed birth like a keen susceptibility of
smell. We never named musk in her presence, her antipathy to it was so
well understood through the household: her opinion on the subject was
believed to be, that no scent derived from an animal could ever be of a
sufficiently pure nature to give pleasure to any person of good family,
where, of course, the delicate perception of the senses had been
cultivated for generations. She would instance the way in which
sportsmen preserve the breed of dogs who have shown keen scent; and how
such gifts descend for generations amongst animals, who cannot be
supposed to have anything of ancestral pride, or hereditary fancies
about them. Musk, then, was never mentioned at Hanbury Court. No more
were bergamot or southern-wood, although vegetable in their nature. She
considered these two latter as betraying a vulgar taste in the person
who chose to gather or wear them. She was sorry to notice sprigs of them
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account