Russian Prisons: St. Peter and St. Paul; the Schlüsselburg; the Ostrog at Omsk; the story of Siberian exile; Tiumen, Tomsk, SaghalienGriffiths, Arthur
History
Russian Prisons: St. Peter and St. Paul; the Schlüsselburg; the Ostrog at Omsk; the story of Siberian exile; Tiumen, Tomsk, Saghalien
Griffiths, Arthur
Exiles -- Russia (Federation) -- Siberia -- History; Prisons -- Russia -- History
A retired military officer named Lagovskoi was shut up in Schlüsselburg
in 1885 by “administrative process,” without trial, and sentenced for
five years, which was prolonged for another five years, still without
trial. For having dared to address the governor with the familiar
“thou,” he was confined in a strait-jacket and his legs were tied
together; then they gagged him, and holding him just a yard above the
ground dropped him repeatedly till his head was cut open. The same
treatment was administered to another prisoner, Popov, who was also
gagged and his head banged upon the floor.
The effect of the imprisonment was seen in its results. In the six years
after 1891, just forty-eight persons were removed into Schlüsselburg
from the Alexis Ravelin, all of them young and in sound health at the
time. At the end of these six years, five had committed suicide or had
been shot, three were still retained but were out of their minds, three
had died insane, nine others had died, the majority of them carried off
by consumption. Twenty out of forty-eight was a large proportion, and
the fact is authenticated by M. Petit, who can give the names and exact
dates.
After the year 1896, the rigours of the régime were in some measure
slackened. Books were allowed, such as scientific manuals, grammars and
dictionaries for the study of languages, and historical books of a date
previous to the eighteenth century, but no works of a purely literary
character and no periodicals, reviews or newspapers. Writing materials
were issued, a few sheets during the daytime, which, with whatever was
written thereon, were withdrawn in the evening. By degrees the dietary
was slightly improved, the period of exercise was prolonged and the
prisoners were occasionally allowed to work in the garden or in the
carpenter’s shop. Still better, association with a fellow prisoner for a
brief space was conceded twice a week when at exercise. Later, extracts
from the letters of relatives were read out to the prisoner once yearly,
communicating a brief message such as, “We are alive and well and living
at such and such a place.” By and by the prisoners were permitted to
reply no less briefly, but never to state where they were confined.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account