Saint Vincent, with notes and publishers' pricesNapier, Francis John Hamilton Scott
History
Saint Vincent, with notes and publishers' prices
Napier, Francis John Hamilton Scott
Postage stamps -- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
This is the first of a very interesting and important series of four
provisional stamps that were made in St. Vincent, in 1880 and 1881, to
supply a temporary want of certain values. From information received
from Mr. Frank W. Griffith, late Acting Colonial Postmaster, and already
published in the West Indian Catalogue of the London Society, we know the
date of issue of the provisional One Penny was May, 1880, and that the
number of stamps issued amounted to 1,800. Reference to Messrs. Perkins,
Bacon and Co.’s list of consignments shows that the last printing of the
black One Penny had been sent out in August, 1878, and it is evident
that another supply of the value had already been ordered, but not
received when this provisional was made, as the new One Penny, printed in
grey-green, was only despatched from London on May 13th, 1880.
The stamp used for surcharging was the dark blue-green Six Pence of
Issue 7, perforated A, a remainder being in hand, probably from the last
printing of March, 1875.
In those days surcharged stamps, especially in British Colonies, were not
so common as unfortunately they have subsequently become, and were much
appreciated by philatelists, as may be seen by the tone of the writer
who chronicled the provisional One Penny in the _Philatelic Record_ of
July, 1880. “A very curious provisional stamp, forming a fit pendant to
the makeshift 1d. employed in Barbadoes in 1878, has been used recently,
but may by this time have become obsolete. The postal authorities of St.
Vincent have treated their 6d. value in the same way as the Barbadians
did their 5s. stamp—perforating it down the centre, and surcharging each
side with 1d. in red, the numeral being 8 mm. in length.” The writer
then goes on to say that the central line of perforation is clean cut,
and gauges 12, which is quite correct, and records a fact worth bearing
in mind when examining doubtful specimens, as the forgers have found
the perforation much more difficult to imitate than the surcharge.
Unfortunately our illustration of this stamp, No. 2, is not as clear as
we could have wished, owing to the red and green colours not lending
themselves readily to photography—so we give the measurements of the
surcharge, which are as follows: Height of figure, 8¾ mm.; width of
figure, 1½ mm.; length of foot of figure, 3½ mm.; height of “d,” 3 mm.;
extreme width of “d,” 2 mm.; space between “d” and figure, 1½ mm.; space
between figures on right and left halves of the same stamp, 8½ mm. The
figure “1” has a straight serif. These details will help to protect
collectors against at least the more ordinary forgeries, but the gauge
of the perforation and its regular clean-cut circular holes are really
the crucial tests, as some of the surcharges are heavily printed, and
are difficult to measure with accuracy. A description of the forgeries
known to us would be of little use. They all fail in the perforation,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account