Saint Vincent, with notes and publishers' pricesNapier, Francis John Hamilton Scott
History
Saint Vincent, with notes and publishers' prices
Napier, Francis John Hamilton Scott
Postage stamps -- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
most of them in the dimensions of the surcharge, and one rather dangerous
one we recently discovered has the figures on the two halves of the
stamps wrongly spaced. The one most likely to be met with is the least
dangerous, as it has a large cross stroke to the top of the figure,
instead of a serif, besides being wrong in many other particulars.
This forgery is evidently copied from the illustration in a well-known
catalogue, and not from the stamp itself.
This provisional One Penny has always been a rare stamp, especially
unused, or in pairs; none of the issue seems to have found its way into
dealers’ stocks, but to have been all used up for legitimate postal
purposes, so that a great part of it must have been destroyed, and only a
small proportion of the original 1,800 saved for philatelic purposes.
Issue 14.
_June 1880_.
1d., pale grey-green.
6d., bright yellow-green.
5s., deep rose-red.
On May 13th, 1880, Messrs. Perkins, Bacon & Co. sent out 1000 sheets
(60,000 stamps) of the One Penny, printed in pale grey-green, 300 sheets
(18,000 stamps) of the Six Pence, printed in bright yellow-green, and
100 sheets (2,000 stamps) of a new value—Five Shillings, printed in deep
rose-red. In this consignment was included the third and last printing
of the One Shilling bright vermilion-red. All the three first mentioned
values were perforated B only, this we know because no other variety of
perforation exists in any of these stamps, the issue of which was in all
three cases confined to this one printing. We think this is a very good
reason for believing that the printing of the One Shilling that was made
at the same time was like them perforated B only, and that at this date
the use of the A machine had been discontinued for ever, as far as the
stamps of St. Vincent are concerned.
The printings of both the One Penny and the Six Pence were small ones.
The former value must have been used up quickly, as a new supply was
ordered in the next year; we may, therefore, expect this stamp to become
much scarcer than any of the same value that preceded it, and of which
such a large quantity were printed.
The Six Pence was the last of that value to be printed by Messrs.
Perkins, Bacon & Co., and it remained current for more than three years,
until October, 1883, when it was succeeded by a stamp printed by Messrs.
De La Rue & Co. About a fifth part of the printing was used in 1881 for
making provisional stamps of the One Penny and Halfpenny values.
It is rather a scarce stamp, even in a used state, and is decidedly rare
unused, it being one of the St. Vincent stamps the dealers appear to have
neglected.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account