Salt and the salt industryCalvert, Albert Frederick
History
Salt and the salt industry
Calvert, Albert Frederick
Salt industry and trade; Salt industry and trade -- England -- Cheshire
It will be convenient here to explain what became of these several
Furnival properties, and then describe very briefly the stages which
led to the inventor’s incarceration in Horsemonger Lane Gaol and
caused him to address his Statement of Facts to the Government. In
April, 1825, he sold his works at Anderton to the British Rock and
Salt Company, which continued to ship salt until 1829. The Marston
property appears to have been worked until 1847. The Wharton works
were managed by Trustees until 1839, when they were taken over by the
National Patent Salt Company, which became one of the most important
firms in the Winsford trade. In 1875, Justice Manisty, the surviving
leaseholder, transferred his interests to Stubbs Brothers, who, in
1888, disposed of the business to the Salt Union.
Furnival had no sooner established himself as a salt-maker at Anderton
than the old salt proprietors, “who had contrived in the past to ruin
all, or any one who should dare to enter the lists against them,”
became seriously alarmed at the apparent magnitude of his plans and
the great improvements which threatened both their exorbitant profits
and their hitherto unchallenged monopoly. Furnival, to employ a
colloquialism, proceeded to “back himself both ways.” Having more than
once proved his strength by breaking up “the Coalition” (which the old
proprietors had formed to regulate the output and price of salt), and
bringing down the price of common salt from 20s. to 8s. per ton, he
offered to erect his patent apparatus at his own cost and risk on the
works of his wealthy rivals, and to allow them two-thirds of the saving
effected by its application. According to Furnival’s unsupported but
uncontradicted account, they ridiculed his offer, declaring that they
wanted none of his patents, that they could command their own profits
in defiance of him, and that they would never sanction any improvements
or innovations in the trade.
Furnival, who had secured patents for France and the Netherlands,
thereafter gave his English competitors a rest and proceeded to erect
salt-works at Rotterdam and Ghent capable of taking nearly 60,000
tons of rock salt annually from the British market. But the English
salt refiners prompted their Dutch and Belgian _confrères_ to bring
official discredit upon the enterprise, and Furnival and his partner
were compelled to abandon their works, which had cost them £13,000 to
erect, and to forgo the £33,000 they were to have received for their
patent rights.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account