Scandinavian influence on Southern Lowland Scotch: A contribution to the study of the linguistic relations of English and ScandinavianFlom, George T. (George Tobias)
History
Scandinavian influence on Southern Lowland Scotch: A contribution to the study of the linguistic relations of English and Scandinavian
Flom, George T. (George Tobias)
Scots language; Scots language -- Foreign words and phrases -- Scandinavian
On the characteristics of primitive Northern and the changes that
had taken place in the language before the Viking period, see
Noreen, P.G.(2)I, 521-526. On pp. 523-526 are summarized the
characteristics of General Northern. Until 800 the Northern tongue
was unitary throughout the Scandinavian North. In the Viking age
dialectal differentiations began to appear, especially in O. Dan.
These are as follows (from Noreen):
About 800, older _hr_ > _r_ in Denmark.
Soon after 800, older diphthongs became simplified in Denmark,
e.g.,
_au_ > _u_ cp. O. Ic. _þau_, O.Gutnic _þaun_ = O. Dan. _þusi_
pronounced _þøsi_.
_ai_, _ei_ > _i_ cp. O. Ic. _stein_, O.N. _stæin_, O.Gtnc.
_stain_ = O. Dan. _stin_.
_io_, _iau_ > _u_ cp. O.N., O. Ic. _briote_, O.Gtnc.
_briauti_ = O. Dan. _biruti_.
Before 1000, _ē_ > _æ_ cp. O.N., O. Ic. _sér_ = O. Dan. _sær_
(written _sar_).
About 1,000, appears in O. Sw.--O. Dan. an excrescent _d_ between
_nn_ and _r_, e.g., _mantr_, pronounced _mandr_ (see Noreen,
p. 526).
7. OLD NORSE AND OLD DANISH.
Not until the year 1,000, or the beginning of the 11th Century, do
dialectal differentiations seem to be fully developed. O.N., which
in general preserves best the characteristics of the old Northern
speech, undergoes at this time a few changes that differentiate Dan.
and Norse still more. O. Sw. remains throughout closer to O. Dan. The
two together are therefore called East Scandinavian. Old Icelandic,
that is, Norse on Icelandic soil, develops its own forms, remaining,
however, in the main very similar to O.N. These two are then called
West Scandinavian. The following are some of the chief differences
between West and East Scandinavian at the time (from Noreen,
P.G.(2)I, 527):
1. _I_--(_R_) and _U_--_Umlaut_ in W.S. Absence of it in E.S.,
e.g.,
W.S. _hældr_ E.S. _halder_.
3 sg. pres. of _halda_, "to hold."
W.S. _i gær_, "yesterday," E.S. _i gar_.
W.S. _lǫnd_, pl. "land," E.S. _land_.
2. Development of _i_, _e_, _y_ into a consonantal _i_ in
diphthongs in W. S., not so in E. S., e.g.,
W.S. _siá_, "to see," E.S. _sēa_.
W.S. _fiánde_, "enemy," E.S. _fiande_.
W.S. _biár_, "of a village," E.S. _býar_.
3. Assimilation of _mp_, _nk_, _nt_, respectively, to _pp_, _kk_,
_tt_ in W.S., retention of them in E.S., e.g.,
W.S. _kroppen_, "crippled," E.S. _krumpin_.
W.S. _ækkia_, "widow," E.S. _ankia_.
W.S. _batt_, "bound," E.S. _binda_.
pret. of _binda_,
4. The Medio-passive:
W.S. _sk_, e.g., _kallask_, E.S. _s_, _kallas_.
5. Pronominal forms:
W.S. _ek_, _vér_ (_mér_), E.S. _iak_, _vīr_,
_ér_ (_þer_), _sem_, _īr_, _sum_.
8. REMARKS.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account