Scandinavian influence on Southern Lowland Scotch: A contribution to the study of the linguistic relations of English and ScandinavianFlom, George T. (George Tobias)
History
Scandinavian influence on Southern Lowland Scotch: A contribution to the study of the linguistic relations of English and Scandinavian
Flom, George T. (George Tobias)
Scots language; Scots language -- Foreign words and phrases -- Scandinavian
Assimilation of _mp_ to _pp_ and _nk_ to _kk_ appears also quite
early in Danish and Swedish, e.g., _kap_ (_kapp_) and _drocken_ (see
Kalkar), _kapp_ and _drokken_ (Sw.). _U--Umlaut_ seems to be more
limited in O.N. than in O. Ic. O. Ic. _hl_, _hn_, _hr_ initially
appear early as simple _l_, _n_, _r_ in O.N. (see Noreen 528), e.g.,
O. Ic. _hlaupa_, O.N. _loupa_; O. Ic. _hniga_, O.N. _niga_; O. Ic.
_hringr_, O.N. _ringr_; O. Ic. _fn_ appears in O.N. as _bn_ or _mn_,
e.g., O. Ic. _nafn_, O.N. _namn_ (N. Norse _navn_, _nabn_, _namn_).
Initial _hv_, which was a heavy guttural spirant, became _kv_ in
Western Norway, _kv_ and _khv_ in Iceland (though written _hv_
still), e.g., O.N., O. Ic. _hvelva_, Norse _kvelva_. O.N. _ø_ became
_æ_ in Iceland, _døma_ > _dæma_. O.N. _æi_ became _ei_ in Iceland,
e.g., O.N. _stæin_ > O. Ic. _stein_, O.N. _bæin_ > O. Ic. _bein_
(_stin_ and _bin_ in O. Dan.).
9. CHARACTERISTICS OF OLD NORTHUMBRIAN.
The following are some of the chief differences between O. Nhb. and
W. S:
1. Preference in O. Nhb. for _a_ in many cases where W. S. has _e_.
2. _A_ sometimes appears in closed syllable where W.S. has æ.
3. _A_ before _l_ + consonant is not broken to _ea_ (Sievers
§121.3, and Lindelöf: Die Sprache des Durham Rituals).
4. _A_ before _r_ + consonant very frequently not broken, cp.
_arm_, _farra_. Breaking occurs more often, however.
5. _E_ before _l_ + consonant not broken in the Ritual (see
Lindelöf).
6. _E_ before _r_ + consonant is broken and appears as either _ea_
or _eo_, cp. _eorthe_, _earthe_.
7. _A_ before _h_, _ht_, _x_ (_hs_) becomes _æ_. Sievers §162.1.
In W.S. _a_ was broken to _ea_, cp. O. Nhb. _sax_, W.S. _seax_.
This Lindelöf explains as due to the different quality of the
_h_--in W.S. it was guttural, hence caused breaking; in Nhb. it
was palatal and hence the preceding _a_ was palatalized to _æ_.
8. Nhb. umlaut of _o_ is _œ_. In W. S. it was _e_, cp.
_dœma_, _sœca_, W. S. _dēman, sēcan_. See Sievers §§27
and 150.4. Bouterwek CXXVII, and Lindelöf. This difference was,
however, levelled out, Nhb. _œ_ becoming also _e_, according to
Sievers.
9. Special Nhb. diphthongs _ei_, _ai_, cp. _heista_, _seista_,
W.S. _hiehsta_, _siexta_.
10. Influence of preceding _w_ was greater than in the South.
A diphthong whose second element was a dark vowel was simplified
generally to a dark vowel (Lindelöf), e.g., _weo_ > _wo_,
_wio_ > _wu_, cp. _weorld_ > _world_, _weord_ > _word_, etc.
11. W.S. _t_ is represented quite frequently by _ð_ or _d_,
regularly so when combined with _l_, often so when combined with
_s_. See Lindelöf above.
12. W.S. _ð_ frequently appears as _d_ in the North; the reverse
also occurs. See Bouterwek CXLII-CXLV. In a few cases _ð_ > _t_.
13. _C_ before _t_ where W. S. regularly has _h_. See Bouterwek.
14. Metathesis of _r_ less extensive than in W. S.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account