Religious disputations -- Fiction; Short stories, Australian
"I mean, Euripides, that your play seems to present two sides: the
action as it is presented in the original myth, and the action which is
the result of your criticism. There are some people who say that if you
are not content with the myths, you should invent your own stories; but
this would defeat your object which is purely critical, and which aims
at presenting another version of the story. You seem to say to yourself:
the myth presents the gods as beings with the same appetites, passions,
and desires as mortals, and so I shall treat them. They are to you mere
characters in the play, and even subordinate characters at that. You
introduce Aphrodite to speak the prologue, and thus, ostensibly
following the myth, make her responsible for the catastrophe. But at the
same time you show that the catastrophe is directly precipitated by the
hastiness of Theseus; a fatal flaw which he himself recognises, and
laments when it is too late. He was over-hasty to use the gift of
Poseidon, he says; but Hippolytus answers that if he had not used that
method of revenge, he would have found another. Theseus implicitly
agrees to this, when he says that some lying spirit had blinded him to
the truth, and thus the guilt is flung back upon Aphrodite, whom Artemis
promises to punish by slaying Adonis. In reality, Euripides, the lying
spirit is not Aphrodite, but Phædra; and you take care that Artemis
should point this out. Thus, at every part of the myth where the action
of the divinities is supposed to be clearly visible, you present us with
another version and another cause; and, by this means, not only do you
make the development of the plot more plausible, and fill us with
admiration for your genius, but ultimately you remove the responsibility
from the gods, by showing that the action of the play is not dependent
upon them. Aphrodite seems to be only the incarnation of Phædra's
desire, and Poseidon of a father's curse. Artemis, it is true, has a
separate existence, and is not merely the personification of a mortal
passion; she exists in order that she may reveal the truth to Theseus,
and for that purpose, had you not been bound by tradition, the nurse
would have done as well. You say, too, in one of the choruses that the
thought of the gods consoles your grief, and that your hope clings to
the belief in a supreme reason; but that when you consider the deeds and
the fate of men you are confounded. Do you think, Euripides, that the
whole evil of life comes from man alone, and that the gods are not
implicated in it?"
Protagoras smiled. Euripides leaned forward, looking at Socrates with
bright eyes from beneath his bent brows.
"The words of the chorus, Socrates, mean that when I consider the
wretchedness and the doom of men, I doubt the existence of a supreme
reason, or at least waver in my belief."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account