Schenk's Theory: The Determination of SexSchenk, Samuel Leopold
Science
Schenk's Theory: The Determination of Sex
Schenk, Samuel Leopold
Sex determination, Genetic; Sex preselection
In this case it very likely happened--as in such experiments it very
easily may happen--that, in consequence of insufficient practical
knowledge on the part of the experimenter, the actual commencement
of the rutting time was overlooked. In addition, it is well known
that animals, in consequence even of an amount of exercise not very
exhausting, and in many other ways, as well as in consequence of the
food they have taken, may exhibit variations in the activity of their
rutting. It is not, therefore, surprising if the results of experiments
show much that was unexpected.
I here pass over a great number of proofs which Thury gives in his
essay. Funcke (1866) made in his ‘Physiology’ the following remarks
on Thury’s theory:--“Although the origin and determination of sex is
not indisputably proved to depend upon the degree of ripeness of the
ovum, it appears to me that we have not reached the right time for
determining the factor upon which it does depend. These experiments
have been made to repose upon a fact, which fact certainly proves,
beyond the possibility of dispute, a relation between the fertilization
of the ovum and the subsequent sex. This fact is that, in the case of
certain creatures capable of parthenogenesis (unisexual procreation),
we find that, from unfertilized ova one sex always results, and from
fertilized ova the other. But any closer interpretation of this
function of the semen is rendered nugatory in advance by this, that it
is in some cases the male and in others the female that results from
the unfertilized ova.”
* * * * *
Thury’s theory can be very suitably brought into agreement with the
theory of cross-heredity of sex, and explained by the assistance of
that view. The cow, at the beginning of her rutting, is not in a
condition of great sexual vigor. If the ovum be effectually fertilized,
it may be supposed that the bull, in procreative activity the superior
consort, will be fitted not to reproduce his own sex, but that of the
weaker cow. At the end of the rutting period the cow, which is brought
to the bull, has her ovum ripened to the highest possible degree, and
in consequence, when compared, from a sexual point of view, with the
bull, is distinctly the stronger and superior, and a male calf is in
this case the result of conception.
According to the theory of cross-heredity of sex, female creatures
should in the former instance be produced, and in the latter males,
which same result is reached in accordance with the theory of Thury.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account