Schools of Gaul in the last century of the Western Empire : $b A study of pagan and Christian education in the last century of the Western empireHaarhoff, T. J. (Theodore Johannes)
History
Schools of Gaul in the last century of the Western Empire : $b A study of pagan and Christian education in the last century of the Western empire
Haarhoff, T. J. (Theodore Johannes)
Education, Ancient -- France; Gaul -- History -- 58 B.C.-511 A.D.
The truth is that the ancients always regarded history more as an art
than as a science. The books of Herodotus came to be called by the names
of the Muses, Sallust and Tacitus strove predominantly after stylistic
effectiveness, and even Thucydides gave oratorical technique a much
more important place than would now be accorded to it. Rhetoric had
cast her spell over the historians as over all the other intellectuals.
Polybius alone resisted, and suffered, in consequence, at the hands of
the critics. ‘The only ancient historian’, Norden writes of him,[1208]
‘who opposed with all his might the influence of rhetoric on the
writing of history, and who, therefore, is most closely related to the
modern point of view, belongs, according to the judgement of Dionysius
of Halicarnassus ... to those dull authors whom nobody can bear to
read through.’ So far had rhetoric asserted its sway over history,
that Cicero, to whom we look for the sane and balanced conception of
rhetorical education, could say that it was permissible for a rhetor
to falsify history for the sake of style,[1209] and could describe the
function of the historian as essentially rhetorical (_unum ... oratorium
maxime_).[1210] A custom that gave special scope to this view of history
was the insertion of imaginary speeches such as we find in Herodotus,
Thucydides, Sallust, and Tacitus. And not only speeches, but letters and
documents were set down in a fictitious form. Against this practice
Quintilian, like Polybius, had warned. The orator’s task, he maintained,
was different from that of the historian. ‘Id quoque vitandum, in
quo magna pars errat, ne in oratione poetas nobis et historicos, in
illis operibus oratores aut declamatores imitandos putemus. Sua cuique
proposita lex, suus cuique decor est.’[1211] But the warning was in vain.
The historians were still trained in the rhetor’s school, and the rhetor
frequently used historical subjects. When Ammianus wrote his history, he
stood in the great tradition of Asiatic rhetoric. Thus history continued
to wear the fetters of oratory.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account