Schools of Gaul in the last century of the Western Empire : $b A study of pagan and Christian education in the last century of the Western empireHaarhoff, T. J. (Theodore Johannes)
History
Schools of Gaul in the last century of the Western Empire : $b A study of pagan and Christian education in the last century of the Western empire
Haarhoff, T. J. (Theodore Johannes)
Education, Ancient -- France; Gaul -- History -- 58 B.C.-511 A.D.
Bulaeus says that the amount of the fee was sometimes left to the
generosity of the parents.[705] He can hardly be referring to a common
practice. The fourth century was far too business-like for this sort of
thing. Most of the teachers who were in a position to do so probably
demanded a large fee, like Exsuperius.[706] How far this bargaining went
on after the law of Gratian we cannot tell: but the fact that it went on
after Vespasian had fixed the salaries shows that it was not necessarily
stopped in 376. Much more liberal was the East. Lectures at Antioch
were open to all, even to pupils of other rhetors:[707] and sometimes
invitations to attend were sent round by the servant of the lecturer.[708]
As to the number of the professors appointed little is known. Probably
from what Ausonius says there were ten at Bordeaux, six ‘grammatici’ and
four ‘rhetores’—the highest number, Jullian thinks, that Bordeaux ever
reached. At Constantinople Theodosius appointed in 425 to his special
_auditorium_[709] three rhetors and ten grammarians for Latin, five
rhetors and ten grammarians for Greek, one professor of philosophy,
and two for law. But this is Eastern exuberance. Trèves, the imperial
favourite, had only two or three rhetoricians, one Latin grammarian, and
one Greek grammarian—a post which could not always be filled.[710]
Denk, in remarking that the number of teachers was thus definitely fixed,
adds that there is no trace of a principal who gave direction to the
work of the students.[711] Now it is true that there was no definite
organization, but it seems very probable that the emperors, when they
interested themselves in a school and appointed teachers, would have
some one at the head of the establishment to facilitate communication
between the imperial offices and the school. Moreover, it is a natural
and traditional thing the world over for a group of men more or less
permanently banded together to have a chief. The Druids had their
leader,[712] and among the Persian Magi there was an archimagus. Besides,
we have at least one ‘trace’ which Denk does not notice. Eumenius,
as head of the Maeniana, was called _moderator_, which looks like an
official title. And in the Christian schools it was a common thing to
have a head (_primicerius_), as will be shown later.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account