Schools of Hellas: An Essay on the Practice and Theory of Ancient Greek Education from 600 to 300 B. C.Freeman, Kenneth J. (Kenneth John)
History
Schools of Hellas: An Essay on the Practice and Theory of Ancient Greek Education from 600 to 300 B. C.
Freeman, Kenneth J. (Kenneth John)
Education, Greek
Generally speaking, therefore, the Spartan schools were only for the
sons of “Peers” (ὅμοιοι [hómoioi]),[10] that is, those who paid the
subscriptions. But a certain number of other boys were admitted,
provided that their food was paid for. A rich Spartan might, if he
chose, select certain other boys to be educated with his own son or
sons, and pay their expenses meanwhile.[11] The number of these
school-companions depended on the number of contributions in kind
which he was capable of supplying. The school-companions could thus
attend the Spartan schools; but they did not become citizens when they
grew up, unless they revealed so much merit that the Spartan State
gave them the franchise.
From what classes were these school-companions drawn? Sometimes they
were foreigners, sons either of distinguished guest-friends of leading
Spartans, or of refugee-settlers in Laconia. Thus Xenophon’s two sons
were educated at Sparta. These foreign boys were called τρόφιμοι
[tróphimoi] or Foster-children. Xenophon mentions “foreigners from
among the τρόφιμοι [tróphimoi].”[12] If these Foster-children, when
grown up, remained in Sparta they possessed no civic rights. A passage
in Plato refers to the difficulty which was experienced in getting
these Foster-children to accept this humble position.[13] It is
interesting to note that Sparta thus precedes Athens as an educational
centre to which boys from foreign cities came to receive their
schooling.
More often Spartan parents chose Helots to be school-companions of
their sons. Thus Plutarch speaks of “two of the foster-brothers of
Kleomenes, whom they call Mothakes.”[14] The name Mothax was applied
to these educated Helots. They seem to have been notorious for the way
in which they presumed upon their position, if we may assume a
connection between Mothax and Mothon, a term which is used for the
patron deity of impudence in Aristophanes, and elsewhere is the name
of a vulgar dance.[15] They were not enfranchised when their
school-days were over, and had to settle down to slavish duties,
unless they showed peculiar merit. But several of the most
distinguished Spartans, including Lusandros, were enfranchised
Mothakes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account