Science and poetryRichards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
History
Science and poetry
Richards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
English poetry -- 20th century -- History and criticism; Poetry
It will be best to begin by asking ‘What _kind of a thing_, in the
widest sense, is poetry?’ When we have answered this we shall be ready
to ask ‘How can we use and misuse it?’ and ‘What reasons are there for
thinking it valuable?’
Let us take an experience, ten minutes of a person’s life, and describe
it in broad outline. It is now possible to indicate its general
structure, to point out what is important in it, what trivial and
accessory, which features depend upon which, how it has arisen, and how
it is probably going to influence his future experience. There are, of
course, wide gaps in this description, none the less it _is_ at last
possible to understand in general how the mind works in an experience,
and what sort of stream of events the experience is.
A poem, let us say Wordsworth’s _Westminster Bridge_ sonnet, is such
an experience, it is the experience the right kind of reader has when
he peruses the verses. And the first step to an understanding of the
place and future of poetry in human affairs is to see what the general
structure of such an experience is. Let us begin by reading it very
slowly, preferably aloud, giving every syllable time to make its full
effect upon us. And let us read it experimentally, repeating it,
varying our tone of voice until we are satisfied that we have caught
its rhythm as well as we are able, and--whether our reading is such as
to please other people or not--we ourselves at least are certain how it
should ‘go.’
Earth has not anything to show more fair:
Dull would he be of soul who could pass by
A sight so touching in its majesty:
This City now doth like a garment wear
The beauty of the morning: silent, bare,
Ships, towers, domes, theatres and temples lie
Open to the fields, and to the sky;
All bright and glittering in the smokeless air.
Never did sun more beautifully steep
In his first splendour valley, rock or hill;
Ne’er saw I, never felt, a calm so deep!
The river glideth at its own sweet will:
Dear God! the very houses seem asleep
And all that mighty heart is lying still!
We may best make our analysis of the experience that arises through
reading these lines from the surface inwards, to speak metaphorically.
The surface is the impression of the printed words on the retina. This
sets up an agitation which we must follow as it goes deeper and deeper.
The first things to occur (if they do not, the rest of the experience
will be gravely inadequate) are the sound of the words ‘in the mind’s
ear’ and the feel of the words imaginarily spoken.[1] These together
give the _full body_, as it were, to the words, and it is with the
full bodies of words that the poet works, not with their printed
signs. But many people lose nearly everything in poetry through these
indispensable parts escaping them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account