Science and the modern worldWhitehead, Alfred North
Religion
Science and the modern world
Whitehead, Alfred North
Science
I cannot now enter upon a chronicle of the various stages of
intellectual advance included within this epoch. It is too large a topic
for one lecture, and would obscure the ideas which it is my purpose to
develop. A mere rough catalogue of some names will be sufficient, names
of men who published to the world important work within these limits of
time: Francis Bacon, Harvey, Kepler, Galileo, Descartes, Pascal,
Huyghens, Boyle, Newton, Locke, Spinoza, Leibniz. I have limited the
list to the sacred number of twelve, a number much too small to be
properly representative. For example, there is only one Italian there,
whereas Italy could have filled the list from its own ranks. Again
Harvey is the only biologist, and also there are too many Englishmen.
This latter defect is partly due to the fact that the lecturer is
English, and that he is lecturing to an audience which, equally with
him, owns this English century. If he had been Dutch, there would have
been too many Dutchmen; if Italian, too many Italians; and if French,
too many Frenchmen. The unhappy Thirty Years’ War was devastating
Germany; but every other country looks back to this century as an epoch
which witnessed some culmination of its genius. Certainly this was a
great period of English thought; as at a later time Voltaire impressed
upon France.
The omission of physiologists, other than Harvey, also requires
explanation. There were, of course, great advances in biology within the
century, chiefly associated with Italy and the University of Padua. But
my purpose is to trace the philosophic outlook, derived from science and
presupposed by science, and to estimate some of its effects on the
general climate of each age. Now the scientific philosophy of this age
was dominated by physics; so as to be the most obvious rendering, in
terms of general ideas, of the state of physical knowledge of that age
and of the two succeeding centuries. As a matter of fact, these concepts
are very unsuited to biology; and set for it an insoluble problem of
matter and life and organism, with which biologists are now wrestling.
But the science of living organisms is only now coming to a growth
adequate to impress its conceptions upon philosophy. The last half
century before the present time has witnessed unsuccessful attempts to
impress biological notions upon the materialism of the seventeenth
century. However this success be estimated, it is certain that the root
ideas of the seventeenth century were derived from the school of thought
which produced Galileo, Huyghens and Newton, and not from the
physiologists of Padua. One unsolved problem of thought, so far as it
derives from this period, is to be formulated thus: Given configurations
of matter with locomotion in space as assigned by physical laws, to
account for living organisms.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account