Science and the modern worldWhitehead, Alfred North
Religion
Science and the modern world
Whitehead, Alfred North
Science
The previous chapters were devoted to the antecedent conditions which
prepared the soil for the scientific outburst of the seventeenth
century. They traced the various elements of thought and instinctive
belief, from their first efflorescence in the classical civilisation of
the ancient world, through the transformations which they underwent in
the Middle Ages, up to the historical revolt of the sixteenth century.
Three main factors arrested attention,—the rise of mathematics, the
instinctive belief in a detailed order of nature, and the unbridled
rationalism of the thought of the later Middle Ages. By this rationalism
I mean the belief that the avenue to truth was predominantly through a
metaphysical analysis of the nature of things, which would thereby
determine how things acted and functioned. The historical revolt was the
definite abandonment of this method in favour of the study of the
empirical facts of antecedents and consequences. In religion, it meant
the appeal to the origins of Christianity; and in science it meant the
appeal to experiment and the inductive method of reasoning.
A brief, and sufficiently accurate, description of the intellectual life
of the European races during the succeeding two centuries and a quarter
up to our own times is that they have been living upon the accumulated
capital of ideas provided for them by the genius of the seventeenth
century. The men of this epoch inherited a ferment of ideas attendant
upon the historical revolt of the sixteenth century, and they bequeathed
formed systems of thought touching every aspect of human life. It is the
one century which consistently, and throughout the whole range of human
activities, provided intellectual genius adequate for the greatness of
its occasions. The crowded stage of this hundred years is indicated by
the coincidences which mark its literary annals. At its dawn Bacon’s
_Advancement of Learning_ and Cervantes’ _Don Quixote_ were published in
the same year (1605), as though the epoch would introduce itself with a
forward and a backward glance. The first quarto edition of _Hamlet_
appeared in the preceding year, and a slightly variant edition in the
same year. Finally Shakespeare and Cervantes died on the same day, April
23, 1616. In the spring of this same year Harvey is believed to have
first expounded his theory of the circulation of the blood in a course
of lectures before the College of Physicians in London. Newton was born
in the year that Galileo died (1642), exactly one hundred years after
the publication of Copernicus’ _De Revolutionibus_. One year earlier
Descartes published his _Meditationes_ and two years later his
_Principia Philosophiae_. There simply was not time for the century to
space out nicely its notable events concerning men of genius.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account