Scientific American Supplement, No. 303, October 22, 1881Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 303, October 22, 1881
Various
Science -- Periodicals
No one at this moment knows what electricity is; but for our present
purpose we may regard it as a fluid, non-elastic, and without weight,
and universally diffused through the universe. To judge by recently
published statements, a large section of the reading public are taught
that this fluid is a source of power, and that it may be made to do the
work of coal. This is a delusion. So long as electricity remains in what
we may call a normal state of repose, it is inert. Before _we can get
any work out of electricity a somewhat greater amount of work must be
done upon it_. If this fundamental and most important truth be kept in
view it will not be easy to make a grave mistake in estimating the value
of any of the numerous schemes for making electricity do work which will
ere long be brought before the public. To render our meaning clearer,
we may explain that in producing the electric light, for instance, a
certain quantity of electricity passes in through one wire to the lamp,
and precisely the same quantity passes out through the other wire, and
on to the earth or return wire completing the circuit. Not only is the
quantity the same, the velocity is also unchanged. But in going through
the lamp the current has done something. It has overcome the resistance
of the carbons, heated them to a dazzling white heat, and so performed
work. In doing this the current of electricity has lost something. Led
from the first lamp to a second, it is found powerless--if the first
lamp be of sufficient size. What is it that the electricity has lost?
It has parted with what electricians would term "potential," or the
capacity for performing work. What this is precisely, or in what way the
presence or absence of potential modifies the nature of the electric
current, no one knows; but it is known that this potential can only be
conferred on electricity by doing work on the electricity in the first
instance. The analogy between electricity and a liquid like water will
now be recognized. So long as the water is at rest, it is inert. If we
pump it up to a height, we confer on it the equivalent of potential.
We can let the water fall into the buckets of an overshot wheel. Its
velocity leaving the tail race may be identical with that at which it
left the supply trough to descend on the wheel. Its quantity will be
the same. It will be in all respects unchanged, just as the current
of electricity passing through a lamp is unchanged; but it has,
nevertheless, lost something. It has parted with its potential--capacity
for doing work--and it becomes once more inert. But the duty which it
discharged in turning the mill wheel was somewhat less than the precise
equivalent of the work done in pumping it up to a level with the top of
the wheel. In the same way the electric current never can do work equal
in amount to the work done on it in endowing it with potential.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account