Scientific American Supplement, No. 303, October 22, 1881Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 303, October 22, 1881
Various
Science -- Periodicals
It will thus be seen that electricity can only be used as a means of
transmitting power from one place to another, or for storing power up
at one time to be used at a subsequent period; but it cannot be used to
originate power in the way coal can be used. It possesses no inherent
potential. It is incapable of performing work unless something is done
to it first. We have spoken of it as a fluid, but only for the sake of
illustration. As we have said, no one knows what it is, but the theory
which bids fair for acceptance is that it is a mode of motion of the
all-pervading ether. Very curious and instructive experiments are now
being carried out in Paris by Dr. Bjerkness, of Christiania, in the
Norwegian section of the electrical exhibition. This gentleman submerges
thin elastic diaphragms in water, and causes them to vibrate, or rather
pulsate, by compressed air. He finds that if they pulsate synchronously
they attract each other. If the pulsations are not simultaneous, the
disks repel each other. From this and other results he has obtained,
it may be argued that the ether plays the part of the water in Dr.
Bjerkness' tank, and that when special forms of vibration are set up
in bodies they become competent to attract or repel other bodies. This
being so, it will be seen that the power of attraction or repulsion of
an electrical body depends in the first instance on the motion set up
in the body attracted or repulsed, and this motion is, of course, some
function of the work originally done on the body. We need not pursue
this argument further. Among the most scientific investigators of the
day it is admitted that the efficiency of electricity as a doer of work,
or a producer of action at a distance, must depend for its value on the
performance of work in some one way or another on the electricity itself
in the first instance. It may be worth while here to dispel a popular
delusion. It is held very generally that electricity can be made, as,
for instance, by the galvanic battery. There is no reason to believe
anything of the kind; but whether it is or is not true that electricity
is actually made by the combustion of zinc in a galvanic trough, it is
quite certain that this electricity, unless it possesses potential, can
do no work, no matter how great its quantity. Of course, it is to be
understood that all electric currents possess potential. If they did
not, their presence would be unknown; but the potential of a current
is in all cases the result of work done on electricity, either by the
oxidation of zinc, or in some other way. This is a broad principle, but
it is strictly consistent in every respect with the truth. Electricity,
then, is, as we have said, totally different from coal; and it can never
become a substitute for it alone. Water power, air power, or what we
may, for want of a better phrase, call chemical power, combined with
electricity, can be used as a substitute for coal; but electricity
cannot of itself be employed to do work.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Scientific American Supplement, No. 303, October 22, 1881 — John Shaqi
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account