Scientific American Supplement, No. 303, October 22, 1881Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 303, October 22, 1881
Various
Science -- Periodicals
It is true, however, that
electricity, on which work has already been done, may be found in
nature. Atmospheric electricity, for example, may perhaps yet be
utilized. It is by no means inconceivable that the electricity contained
in a thunder cloud might be employed to charge a Faure battery; but up
to the present no one has contemplated the obtaining of power from the
clouds, and whether it is or is not practicable to utilize a great
natural force in this way does not affect our statement. The use of
electricity must be confined to its power of transmitting or storing up
energy, and this truth being recognized, it becomes easy to estimate the
future prospects of electricity at something like their proper value.
It has been proved to a certain extent that electricity can be used to
transmit power to a distance, and that it can be used to store it up.
Thus far the man of pure science. The engineer now comes on the stage
and asks--Can practical difficulties be got over? Can it be made to pay?
In trying to answer these questions we cannot do better than deal with
one or two definite proposals which have been recently made. That with
which we shall first concern ourselves is that trains should be worked
by Faure batteries instead of by steam. It is suggested that each
carriage of a train should be provided with a dynamo motor, and that
batteries enough should be carried by each to drive the wheels, and so
propel the train. Let us see how such a scheme would comply with working
conditions. Let us take for example a train of fifteen coaches on the
Great Northern Railway, running without a stop to Peterborough in one
hour and forty minutes. The power required would be about 500 horses
indicated. To supply this for 100 minutes, even on the most absurdly
favorable hypothesis, no less than 25 tons of Faure batteries would be
required. Adding to these the weight of the dynamo motors, and that
unavoidably added to the coaches, it will be seen that a weight equal to
that of an engine would soon be reached. The only possible saving would
be some 28 to 30 tons of tender. In return for this all the passengers
would have to change coaches at Peterborough, as the train could not be
delayed to replace the expended with fresh batteries. This is out of
the question. The Faure batteries must all be carried on one vehicle or
engine, which could be changed for another, like a locomotive. Even then
no advantage would be gained. As to cost, it is very unlikely that the
stationary engines which must be provided to drive the dynamo machines
for charging the batteries would be more economical than locomotive
engines; and if we allow that the dynamo machine only wasted 10 per
cent. of the power of the engine, the Faure batteries 10 per cent. of
the power of the dynamo machines, and the dynamo motors 10 per cent. of
the power of the batteries--all ridiculously favorable assumptions--yet
the stationary engines would be handicapped with a difference in net
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account