Scientific American Supplement, No. 648, June 2, 1888.Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 648, June 2, 1888.
Various
Science -- Periodicals
It is not my intention to dwell upon arc lighting now only long enough to
state that, after two years of practical experience with the combination,
our company consider they have taken a right step in adopting it, and that
it is satisfactory in every respect. Other gas companies that have adopted
the arc system can undoubtedly corroborate this with their experience. I
would make this paper a continuation of the last one by now taking up the
incandescent electric system and fuel gas question. That both will be
introduced into every city in the United States before long by some one I
have not a shadow of a doubt; and why? Simply because they are both
desirable commodities in domestic economy and hygiene.
Please lay aside all prejudice, and I will show you an ideal domestic
burner for illumination purposes. Now, what comprises an ideal burner for
domestic use? In the first place, such a burner must not blacken our walls
and ceilings, neither must it give off deleterious products of combustion;
it must be a steady light, and not subject to draughts; it must not give
out heat in summer, it must not be possible for inflammable goods to
ignite by coming in contact with it; it must be a light that will have no
ill effect if by accident the key is left open; it must be a light that
our country cousins cannot blow out, neither must it be one that requires
dangerous matches to ignite it, and lastly, it must be a fairly cheap
light.
Now, gentlemen, if you have thrown prejudice to the winds, perhaps you can
recognize in this ideal burner the incandescent electric light for
domestic use. Now, if this light is an ideal one, who is going to prevent
its adoption by the public? Gas companies cannot, and if they cannot no
one can. So, in my mind, the wisest course to pursue is to admit what we
know to be true, and proceed at once to supply the demand, increase our
revenue, push out into the suburbs of our cities, sell it as cheaply as
possible, and don't let others come in and take away what rightly belongs
to you. If there is any money to be made in the business by others, there
is still more in it for us.
For store purposes, where the hours of burning are defined, I think it
better to abandon the meter system and fix a price per annum or month for
each lamp, taking into consideration the hours of use as a basis for
charges. For private dwellings this would not be practicable, and we would
have to resort in this case to meters, or perhaps fix upon a price for
furnishing the current and have the consumer purchase the bulbs or lamps
whenever renewals were necessary. In this way economy would cheapen the
light to the consumer. Any method that will dispense with the meter and
still be satisfactory will be the one to adopt.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account