Scientific American Supplement No. 822, October 3, 1891Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement No. 822, October 3, 1891
Various
Science -- Periodicals
Hardly had I observed these things, which are perfectly well known to
those who have been able to familiarize themselves with the ordinary
effects of compressed air as used in caissons and submarine works of
various kinds, when my attention became attracted by what at first
appeared to be a phenomenon of trivial importance. In a word, I
observed that some of the men exposed to the effects of the compressed
air were more exhilarated by it than others. Upon superficial
reflection one might have supposed that this discrepancy in
physiological effect was to be accounted for merely on the basis of
constitutional idiosyncrasy; maturer thought, however, convinced me
that the exaggerated effects of the condensed air were both too
numerous and too constant to be amenable to such an explanation. This
led me to study the habits of the men; and thus it was that I arrived
at a discovery of real practical value to neurotherapy. To be brief, I
found that a certain percentage of the men, before entering the
compressed air employed in the construction of the Hudson River
tunnel, were in the habit of drinking a quantity of alcohol, usually
in the form of whisky. So long as these men remained outside the
tunnel, where the atmospheric conditions were normal, they were not
visibly affected by their potations. When, however, they entered the
compressed air of the tunnel, but a short time elapsed before they
became exhilarated to an inordinate degree, acting, as one of the
foremen graphically expressed it, "as though they owned the town."
On the other hand, when the customary draught of alcohol was withheld
from them, these same men were no more, if as much, exhilarated on
entering the compressed air as were their fellows.
The effects of alcohol, then, are enhanced by exposing the subject to
the influence of an atmosphere condensed to a considerable degree
beyond that of the normal atmosphere.
Acting on the hint derived from this discovery, I proceeded to
administer absinthe, ether, the wine of coca, vermouth, champagne, and
other stimulants, before exposing the subject to the influence of the
condensed atmosphere, and invariably observed analogous effects, i.e.,
palpable augmentation of the physiological effects of the remedy.
Upon what principle does this augmentation of physiological effect
depend? how is it to be accounted for?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account