Second Shetland Truck System ReportGuthrie, William
History
Second Shetland Truck System Report
Guthrie, William
Labor law -- Truck system -- History -- England; Shetland (Scotland) -- History
2492. Did she always knit with her own wool?-Always with
me. She did not knit specially to me, that I recollect of I have
no recollection of ever employing her. [Shown account in
work-book.] I see from this that she has knitted for me. She
knitted three shawls for me in 1867. The others are shawls she
knitted for herself, and sold in the shop. At 15, March 1870, she
was due me £4, 16s. 31/2d.
2493. I see that between March 29 and December 28 she has paid
off that balance with the exception about £1?-Yes. Then she said
in her evidence that she would not have taken out so much in
clothes, or half so much, if it had not been that she was compelled
to take goods for her work. Now I would ask how that statement is
consistent with the fact that for about twelve months she was due
me that sum, mostly for clothes, when she was not asked to take
them, but the reverse.
2494. She got them on credit?-Yes.
2495. Then this account of hers you happen to have, because she
was knitting at that time for you?-I would not assign that is a
reason for her getting the goods.
2496. But I am asking you the reason why you have this
account?-Because it is in my books.
2497. I rather understood that the only women who had accounts
entered in your books were those who were employed by you as
knitters: is not that so?-Of course, when the women get into my
debt, I must take note of what they bring to me with which to
pay off their debt; and that must pass through my books. I do not
take a note of all the transactions over the counter; it is only when
a woman runs into debt that anything appears in the books.
2498. Is this account taken from what you call the work-book?-
No; it is entered first in our ledgers, and now it has been
transferred to the work-book.
2499. Is the ledger a different book?-The work-book is a kind of
compound between the two. It was entered first in the one, and
then in the other.
2500. But it was because the woman was working for you that the
account happened to be put in that form?-Of course. I think that
was mostly the way in which the credit was got. She would just
creep in and then, and she was in the habit of getting things that
she asked for, and these were put into the book. That is the only
way in which I can account for her getting them. But I would
draw attention to the copy of her account, as showing that she got
goods she needed them and it was a mere subterfuge for her to say
that she got goods from the merchant although she did not knit for
him.
2501. Is there anything further you wish to say with regard to the
evidence of Elizabeth Robertson?-Nothing, except with regard to
these two items of it.
2502. When she was under examination she handed me this line
[showing line quoted in Elizabeth Robertson's evidence]; and I
have also got a line in these
'C. Y. 92.-Credit bearer value in goods for 18s.
'R. SINCLAIR & CO.
'J.J.B.
'22. 12. 71.'
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account