world so diseased through and through with the spirit of cant, as we
English are now: except perhaps the old Jews, at the time of our Lord’s
coming. You hear men talking as if they thought God did not understand
English, because they cling superstitiously to the letter of the Bible in
proportion as they lose its spirit. You hear men taking words into their
mouths which might make angels weep and devils tremble, with a coolness
and oily, smooth carelessness which shows you that they do not feel the
force of what they are saying. You hear them using the words of
Scripture, which are in themselves stricter and deeper than all the books
of philosophy in the world, in such a loose unscriptural way, that they
make them mean anything or nothing. They use the words like parrots, by
rote, just because their forefathers used them before them. They will
tell you that cholera is a judgment for our sins, “in a sense,” but if
you ask them for what sins, or in what sense, they fly off from that
_home_ question, and begin mumbling commonplaces about the inscrutable
decrees of Providence, and so on. It is most sad, all this; and most
fearful also.
Therefore, I asked you, my friends, what is the meaning of that word
judgment? In common talk, people use it rightly enough, but when they
begin to talk of God’s judgments, they speak as if it merely meant
punishments. Now judgment and punishment are two things. When a judge
gives judgment, he either acquits or condemns the accused person; he
gives the case for the plaintiff, or for the defendant: the punishment of
the guilty person, if he be guilty, is a separate thing, pronounced and
inflicted afterwards. His judgment, I say, is his _opinion_ about the
person’s guilt, and even so God’s judgments are the expression of His
opinion about our guilt. But there is this difference between man and
God in this matter—a human judge gives his opinion in words, God gives
His in events: therefore there is no harm for a human judge when he has
told a person why he must punish, to punish him in some way that has
nothing to do with his crime—for instance, to send a man to prison
because he steals, though it would be far better if criminals could be
punished in kind, and if the man who stole could be forced either to make
restitution, or work out the price of what he stole in hard labour. For
this is God’s plan—God always pays sinners back in kind, that He may not
merely punish them, but _correct_ them; so that by the kind of their
punishment, they may know the kind of their sin. God punishes us, as I
have often told you, not by His caprice, but by His laws. He does not
_break His laws_ to harm us; the laws themselves harm us, when we break
them and get in their way. It is always so, you will find, with great
national afflictions. I believe, when we know more of God and His laws,
we shall find it true even in our smallest private sorrows. God is
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account