Books and reading -- Great Britain; Conduct of life; Social problems; Women
(I.) I say first we have despised literature. What do we, as a nation,
care about books? How much do you think we spend altogether on our
libraries, public or private, as compared with what we spend on our
horses? If a man spends lavishly on his library, you call him mad—a
bibliomaniac. But you never call any one a horsemaniac, though men ruin
themselves every day by their horses, and you do not hear of people
ruining themselves by their books. Or, to go lower still, how much do
you think the contents of the book-shelves of the United Kingdom, public
and private, would fetch, as compared with the contents of its
wine-cellars? What position would its expenditure on literature take, as
compared with its expenditure on luxurious eating? We talk of food for
the mind, as of food for the body: now a good book contains such food
inexhaustibly; it is a provision for life, and for the best part of us;
yet how long most people would look at the best book before they would
give the price of a large turbot for it? Though there have been men who
have pinched their stomachs and bared their backs to buy a book, whose
libraries were cheaper to them, I think, in the end, than most men’s
dinners are. We are few of us put to such trial, and more the pity; for,
indeed, a precious thing is all the more precious to us if it has been
won by work or economy; and if public libraries were half so costly as
public dinners, or books cost the tenth part of what bracelets do, even
foolish men and women might sometimes suspect there was good in reading,
as well as in munching and sparkling: whereas the very cheapness of
literature is making even wise people forget that if a book is worth
reading, it is worth buying. No book is worth anything which is not
worth _much_; nor is it serviceable, until it has been read, and re-read,
and loved, and loved again; and marked, so that you can refer to the
passages you want in it, as a soldier can seize the weapon he needs in an
armoury, or a housewife bring the spice she needs from her store. Bread
of flour is good; but there is bread, sweet as honey, if we would eat it,
in a good book; and the family must be poor indeed, which, once in their
lives, cannot, for, such multipliable barley-loaves, pay their baker’s
bill. We call ourselves a rich nation, and we are filthy and foolish
enough to thumb each other’s books out of circulating libraries!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account