“In appearance, as in everything else, he was unlike the typical
schoolmaster: his thoughtful, handsome, somewhat sensuous features
were altogether out of the common; and owing to his short sight he
had a dreamy, mystic, inquiring way of looking at you which was
sometimes a little disquieting to the schoolboy mind. There were
occasions, too, when we dreaded his tart sayings (the very school
books written by him bristled with epigrams), and listened with
some anxiety to his sharp, staccato utterances, or watched him
during those ‘accusing silences’ by which, hardly less than by his
barbed speeches, he could awe the most unruly class. His blindness
led to a prevalent story (apocryphal, I believe, as it was told
also of other persons at different times) that he had been seen
pursuing a hen down Windsor Hill, and making futile grabs at her,
under the belief that she was his hat; but it is certain that he
was sometimes seen standing stock-still in School Yard, or some
open space, apparently unconscious of all observers or passers-by,
and wrapt in a profound daydream. Singular he undoubtedly was, to a
degree that was inconvenient to a schoolmaster; and there were
queer anecdotes of certain too generous suppers that he gave to his
favourites among the boys, when he began by politely overlooking
that they were getting drunk, and ended by unceremoniously kicking
them downstairs.”[4]
“Formerly wise men used to grow beards. Now other persons do so.” This
sentence in _Nuces_, an exercise-book of William Johnson’s compilation,
was supposed by us to be aimed at another assistant master, a bearded
clergyman, bluff, honest, mannerless, and universally disliked, who went
by the name of “Stiggins.” He had a detestable habit of standing at
right angles to any one with whom he was conversing, while he looked
straight away in front of him, his long red beard streaming down to his
waist, and when he spoke, he jerked his words at you, as it were, from
round the corner. His rudeness was a by-word; and the attempt sometimes
made to excuse it, on the ground that it “was not intended,” did not
appeal very strongly I think, either to masters or to boys: and justly,
for surely the only sort of rudeness which can be pardoned is that which
_is_ intended. There are occasions, rare, but real, when it is necessary
and wholesome to be rude; but to be rude without knowing it is the very
acme of ill manners, and that was precisely the kind of discourtesy in
which “Stiggins” was unequalled.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account