Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616 -- Knowledge -- Book industries and trade
Some more time
Must wear the _print_ of his remembrance out.
_Cymbeline_, ii, 3.
The _impressure_.
_Twelfth Night_, ii, 5.
He will _print_ them, out of doubt.
_Merry Wives of Windsor_, ii, 1.
We quarrel in _print_, by the book.
_As You Like It_, v, 4.
Let it _stamp_ wrinkles in her brow.
_Lear_, i, 4.
His sword death's _stamp_.
_Coriolanus_, ii, 2.
Hear how deftly Title-pages are treated:
_Sim._ Knights,
To say you're welcome were superfluous.
To place upon the _volume_ of your deeds,
As in a _title-page_, your worth of arms,
Were more than you expect, or more than's fit.
_Pericles_, ii, 3.
Hear, too, Northumberland, who thus addresses the bearer of fearful news:
This man's brow, like to a _title-leaf_,
Foretells the nature of a tragic _volume_.
_2 Henry IV_, i, 1.
Evidently Shakspere had a good idea of what a Title-page should contain.
From Title to Preface is but a turn of the leaf, and its introductory
character is thus noticed:
Is but a _Preface_ of her worthy praise,
The chief perfections of that lovely dame.
_1 Henry VI_, v, 5.
We must not forget a well-known passage about the introduction of Printing
to England, which has caused much discussion. It is where Jack Cade
accuses Lord Saye:
Thou hast most traitorously corrupted the youth of the realm in
erecting a grammar-school: and whereas, before, our forefathers had no
other books but the score and the tally, thou hast caused printing to
be used; and, contrary to the king, his crown, and dignity, thou hast
built a paper mill.
_2 Henry VI_, iv, 7.
The early-invented fable of Faustus, and the assistance given him by the
Devil in the multiplication of the first printed bibles (certainly a most
short-sighted step on the part of his Satanic Majesty) had got fixed in
the minds of the populace, and created among the ignorant a prejudice
against the Printing-press, and it was to this feeling Jack Cade appealed.
All our Chroniclers place the erection of a Printing-press in England some
years too early, but no one except Shakspere has put the date so far back
as 1450, the date of Jack Cade's insurrection: it is simply a blunder; but
it was the Printing-press and its introduction to this country that was in
the Author's brain, and the _exact_ date of that event was unknown, being
probably as difficult to arrive at then as it is now.[1]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account