Shipbuilding from its beginnings. Vol. 1 (of 3)Konijnenburg, E. van (Emile)
History
Shipbuilding from its beginnings. Vol. 1 (of 3)
Konijnenburg, E. van (Emile)
Shipbuilding -- History; Ships -- History
The operation of putting up some of these forks is seen in a number
of the pictures. Ermann calls attention to the fact, but wrongly in
my opinion, that in one of these figures, the crew is occupied in
stretching the rope in order to give to the boat the desired curve.
(~Ermann~, p. 604.) That this is not so comes out clearly, for
me, first from the fact that the boat is already shored and hence has
already received its final shape. In the second place, the shores
would not be kept in position if the form of the ship were being
modified; hence, they would not have been drawn. Finally, it is hard
to admit that some of the hands should continue to work quietly on the
ship, as shown in the picture, while others are, so to speak, in the
act of strengthening its curve; because the sides must have spread,
necessarily, during this latter operation. Consequently the men are
employed merely in setting up the fork which is to carry the rope. It
is easy to understand, besides, that this should be done before the
shores are removed because after they are taken away the rope would
have become properly taut at the least bending of the ship.
[Sidenote: II 17]
[Sidenote: II 19]
It follows, from what precedes, that the Egyptian boat was not a sea
craft. Even the boats which went as far as Phœnicia, situated on the
Red Sea, and must have been real sea vessels, are represented in the
figures in absolutely the same way as are the ordinary river craft.
When King Necho (B. C. 612 to 596), who encouraged commerce, felt
the need for possessing a fleet, he applied to some Greeks for the
construction of sea-going ships, and Phœnicians, not Egyptians, were
employed for great maritime expeditions. (~Ermann~, p. 646; ~Holmes~,
p. 26; Dr. ~Moritz Rühlmann~ p. 39; ~G. Masporo~, _Histoire Ancienne
des Peuples d’Orient_, 1893, pp. 536 and 537.) _It was the Phœnicians,
and not the Egyptians, who thus became the pioneers of shipbuilding in
the Mediterranean._
It is a general phenomenon to see nations, who enter into reciprocal
relations, copy very quickly, from each other whatever pertains to
the art of shipbuilding. And, could it be otherwise? The struggle
for life produces this phenomenon in a perfectly natural way both in
military and commercial affairs. When a fleet was not able to stand up
against that of the enemy, vessels similar to those of the adversary
or even stronger were built. So it was formerly, so it is to-day. But
the special features which in the past characterized the ships of
the different peoples have passed away, and at the present time the
nationality of vessels can no longer be recognized save by the flags
which they fly. It is not surprising, therefore, that the different
nations, which used to dwell on the shores of the Mediterranean and
which reached their prime almost simultaneously, or shortly after one
other, did not each have a type of boat belonging especially to its own
country.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account