Signalling across space without wires: being a description of the work of Hertz & his successorsLodge, Oliver, Sir
Science
Signalling across space without wires: being a description of the work of Hertz & his successors
Lodge, Oliver, Sir
Electric waves; Telegraph, Wireless
Invariably, when the receiver is in good condition, sound or other
mechanical disturbance acts one way, viz., in the direction of
increasing resistance, while electrical radiation or jerks act the
other way, decreasing it. While getting the receiver into condition,
or when it is getting out of order, vibrations and sometimes electric
discharges act irregularly; and an occasional good shaking does the
filings good. I have taken rough measurements of the resistance by the
simple process of restoring the original galvanometer deflection by
adding or removing resistance coils. A half-inch tube, 8 in. long, of
selected iron turnings (Fig. 18) had a resistance of 2,500 ohms in the
sensitive state. A feeble stimulus, caused by a distant electrophorus
spark, brought it down 400 ohms. A rather stronger one reduced it by
500 and 600, while a trace of spark given to a point of the circuit
itself ran it down 1,400 ohms.
This is only to give an idea of the quantities. I have not yet done any
seriously metrical experiments.
_Added later._--My assistant, Mr. E. E. Robinson, early noticed that
when a telephone was used as receiver, say with a single-point coherer
(_see_ illustration on opposite page), which is a very sensitive
arrangement, every disturbance of the coherer due to received waves is
accompanied by a crackle or tick in the telephone, without any tapping
back being necessary. This is, indeed, the easiest mode of receiving
signals, and we often practised it. If a suitable, well-damped
galvanometer, such as a Thomson marine speaking-galvanometer, is
included also in the circuit (a more sensitive one is sometimes
necessary--and we frequently used a D’Arsonval--but it must be well
damped), the meaning of these ticks is recognised; each represents a
minute change in the resistance of the coherer--not at all the full
change usually employed, but little subsidiary changes, sometimes up
and sometimes down, barely sufficient to affect a galvanometer, but
quite adequate (being so sudden) to disturb a telephone. This method
of receiving, which at first is very sensitive, after a time becomes
less so; the point shows signs of fatigue, probably due to too perfect
cohesion having been gradually established, and a mechanical tap back
is desirable to restore it to its original condition.
If all the signals received were precisely of the same strength, I
doubt if these superposed crimples of resistance would occur; but
signals depending on quality of sending spark never are of the same
strength, and accordingly the sudden slight variations of resistance
do occur. Usually an ordinary high resistance telephone was employed,
and it was joined to the coherer circuit through one of the usual small
transformers--a plan which has many obvious advantages.
[Illustration: Simplest Receiving Arrangement: a Telephone in Circuit
with Single-point Coherer without Tapper-back. B a needle resting
against a watch-spring A adjusted by screw C.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account