Probably the unkindest cut of all, though no doubt the result of
thoughtlessness, was Sir Redvers Buller’s telegram of 25th January:
‘Warren’s garrison, I am sorry to say, I find this morning had in
the night abandoned Spion Kop.’ He might have said ‘Thorneycroft’s
garrison,’ and he could well have afforded to say ‘my garrison,’
but this would have been to abandon the _rôle_ of the irresponsible
critic.
So also he declined to hold any investigation into the circumstances
of the withdrawal as proposed by Sir Charles Warren. He says in his
despatch:
‘I have not thought it necessary to order any investigation. If
at sundown the defence of the summit had been taken regularly in
hand, intrenchments laid out, gun emplacements prepared, the dead
removed, the wounded collected, and, in fact, the whole place
brought under regular military command, and careful arrangements
made for the supply of water and food to the scattered fighting
line, the hills would have been held, I am sure.
‘But no arrangements were made. General Coke appears to have
been ordered away just as he would have been useful, and no one
succeeded him; those on the top were ignorant of the fact that guns
were coming up, and generally there was a want of organisation and
system that acted most unfavourably upon the defence.’
Such a string of inconsistencies and erroneous statements only
shows that not only did Sir Redvers Buller not think it necessary
to order an official investigation, but that he did not even think
it necessary before writing his despatch to take the trouble to
ascertain the facts for himself.
_At sundown_, before any defence could be taken regularly in hand,
the abandonment had not only been decided upon by Lieut.-Colonel
Thorneycroft, but the preparations for retirement were actually
commenced. This he might have gathered from Lieut.-Colonel
Thorneycroft’s report, in which he says: ‘When night began to close
in I determined to take some steps,’ &c., and there must have been
other reports, which have not been published, before him from which
he could have known the precise time when the retirement was arranged.
After categorically enumerating the various arrangements that should
have been made at nightfall in order to hold the position on the
following day, Sir Redvers Buller writes: ‘But no arrangements were
made.’ He does not say who should have made them, or who should have
carried them out, but the inference from what he says is that as
‘General Coke appears to have been ordered away just as he would have
been useful,’ he considers that Major-General Coke should have made
them.
But Major-General Coke did not receive the order to go and see Sir
Charles Warren until 9.30 P.M., some three hours after nightfall, and
after the order for withdrawal had been given.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account