Sir Henry Irving—A Record of Over Twenty Years at the LyceumFitzgerald, Percy
General
Sir Henry Irving—A Record of Over Twenty Years at the Lyceum
Fitzgerald, Percy
Irving, Henry, Sir, 1838-1905
“That actor never knew—or, if he knew, could never remember—what he
had for dinner on that Christmas afternoon. He revelled in the luxury
of warm garments. The roast beef was nothing to him in comparison with
the comfort of his under-vest; he appreciated the drawers more than
the plum-pudding. Proud, happy, warm, and comfortable, he felt little
inclination to eat; but sat quietly, and thanked Providence and Joe
Robins with all his heart. ‘You seem to enter into that poor actor’s
feelings very sympathetically.’ ‘I have good reason to do so, replied
Irving, with his sunshiny smile, ‘_for I was that poor actor_!’”
This really simple, most affecting, incident he himself related when on
his first visit to America.
Most actors have a partiality for what may be called fantastic freaks
or “practical jokes,” to be accounted for perhaps by a sort of reaction
from their own rather monotonous calling. The late Mr. Sothern delighted
in such pastimes, and Mr. Toole is not exactly indifferent to them. The
excitement caused by that ingenious pair of mountebanks, the Davenport
Brothers, will still be recalled: their appearance at Manchester early
in 1865 prompted our actor to a lively method of exposure, which he
carried out with much originality. With the aid of another actor, Mr.
Philip Day, and a prestidigitator, Mr. Frederic Maccabe, he arranged his
scheme, and invited a large number of friends and notables of the city
to a performance in the Athenæum. Assuming the dress characteristics
of a patron of the Brothers, one Dr. Ferguson, Irving came forward
and delivered a grotesque address, and then, in the usual familiar
style, proceeded to “tie up” his coadjutors in the cabinet, with the
accompaniments of ringing bells, beating tambourines, etc. The whole
was, as a matter of course, successful. It was not, however, strictly
within the programme of an actor who was “toiling at his oar,” though the
vivacity of youth was likely enough to have prompted it.
On the eve of his departure from Manchester he determined on an ambitious
attempt, and, as already stated, played ‘Hamlet’ for his own benefit. The
company good-naturedly favoured his project, though they fancied it was
beyond his strength. It was, as he has told us, an extraordinary success,
and the performance was called for on several nights—a high compliment,
as it was considered, in the city, where the custom was to require a “new
bill” every night. He himself did not put much faith in the prophecies
of future eminence that were uttered on this occasion; he felt that,
after all, there was no likelihood of his emerging from the depressing
monotonous round of provincial histrionics. But rescue was nearer at hand
than he fancied. The stage is stored with surprises, and there, at least,
it is the unexpected that always, or usually, happens.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account