Sir Henry Irving—A Record of Over Twenty Years at the LyceumFitzgerald, Percy
General
Sir Henry Irving—A Record of Over Twenty Years at the Lyceum
Fitzgerald, Percy
Irving, Henry, Sir, 1838-1905
Leaving Manchester, he passed to Edinburgh, Bury, Oxford, and even to
Douglas, Isle of Man, where the assembly-room used to do duty as a
“fit-up” theatre. For six months, from January to July, 1866, he was at
Liverpool with Mr. Alexander Henderson.
Thus had he seen many men and many theatres and many audiences, and must
have learned many a rude lesson, besides learning his profession. At this
moment, as he described it long after, he found himself one day standing
on the steps of the theatre looking hopelessly down the street, and in a
sort of despair, without an engagement, and no very likely prospect of
engagement, not knowing, indeed, which way to turn, unless some “stroke
of luck” came. But the “actor’s luck,” as he said, “is really _work_;”
and the lucky actor is, above all, a worker. At this hopeless moment
arrived unexpectedly a proposal from Dion Boucicault that he should join
him at Manchester and take a leading character in his new piece. He
accepted; but with some shrewdness stipulated that should he succeed to
the author’s satisfaction, he was to obtain an engagement in London. This
was acceded to, and with a light heart he set off.
Mr. Boucicault, indeed, long after in America boasted that it was his
good fortune to “discover Irving” in 1866, when he was playing in “the
country.” The performance took place on July 30, 1866. “He was cast
for a part in ‘Hunted Down,’ and played it so admirably that I invited
my friend Mr. Charles Reade to go and see him. He confirmed my opinion
so strongly, that when ‘Hunted Down’ was played in London a few months
afterwards, I gave it conditionally on Mr. Irving’s engagement. That
was his _début_ in London as a leading actor.” He added some judicious
criticism, distinguishing Irving as “an eccentric serious actor” from
Jefferson, who was “an eccentric comic actor.” “His mannerisms are
so very marked that an audience requires a long familiarity with his
style before it can appreciate many merits that are undeniable. It is
unquestionable that he is the greatest actor as a tragedian that London
has seen during the last fifty years.”[2]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account