Flower, William Henry, 1831-1899; Zoologists -- Great Britain -- Biography
“The fact now seems clearly demonstrated that at various spots across
the great African Continent, within a few degrees north and south of the
Equator, extending from the Atlantic coast to near the shores of the
Albert Nyanza (30° E. long.) and perhaps ... even further to the east,
south of the Galla land, are still surviving, in scattered districts,
communities of these small Negroes, all much resembling each other in
size, appearance, and habits, and dwelling mostly apart from their
taller neighbours, by whom they are everywhere surrounded.... In many
parts, especially at the west, they are obviously holding their own with
difficulty, if not actually disappearing, and there is much about their
condition of civilisation, and the situations in which they are found,
to induce us to look upon them, as in the case of the Bushmen in the
south and the Negritos in the east, as the remains of a population which
occupied the land before the incoming of the present dominant races. If
the account of the Nasamenians, related by Herodotus, be accepted as
historical, the river they came to, ‘flowing from west to east,’ must
have been the Niger, and the northward range of the dwarfish people far
more extensive twenty-three centuries ago than it is at the present time.”
Sir William’s only remaining anthropological paper of any importance
appears to be one on skulls of the aboriginal natives of Jamaica,
published in the _Journal_ of the Anthropological Institute for 1890.
It should not, however, be forgotten that, as more fully narrated in an
earlier chapter, one of the last acts of Sir William’s scientific career
was to organise the arrangement of the anthropological series in the
Natural History Branch of the British Museum—an undertaking of which he
was not spared to witness the completion (so far as anything of this
nature can be said to be anywhere near “complete”).
If he had left nothing but his anthropological labours to bear testimony
to his zeal for science and his capacity for organisation, Sir William
Flower would have deserved well of posterity. And it should be recorded
to his credit that the majority of naturalists, at all events in this
country, are employing, with some minor modifications, not only his
anthropological classification, but that of mammals in general. It is
true that both these schemes were based on the labours and ideas of his
predecessors, but it was reserved for him to so modify and improve them
as to lead to the almost universal acceptation with which they have been
received.
CHAPTER VIII
MUSEUM AND MISCELLANEOUS WORK
Much of the substance of this chapter has been already alluded to in the
earlier portions of the present volume; but it has been found convenient
to give Sir William’s views on the objects and arrangement of museums
somewhat more fully in this place, while reference is also made to
various items of miscellaneous work which do not fall within the scope of
either of the three previous chapters.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account