Sketch of the life of Abraham LincolnArnold, Isaac N.
History
Sketch of the life of Abraham Lincoln
Arnold, Isaac N.
Lincoln, Abraham, 1809-1865
Two men presenting more striking contrasts, physically, intellectually,
and morally, could not anywhere be found. Douglas was a short, sturdy,
resolute man, with large head and chest, and short legs; his ability had
gained for him the appellation of "The little giant of Illinois."
Lincoln was of the Kentucky type of men, very tall, long-limbed,
angular, awkward in gait and attitude, physically a real giant,
large-featured, his eyes deep-set under heavy eyebrows, his forehead
high and retreating, with heavy, dark hair.
Their style of speaking, like every thing about them, was in striking
contrast. Douglas, skilled by a thousand conflicts in all the strategy
of a face to face encounter, stepped upon the platform and faced the
thousands of friends and foes around him with an air of conscious power.
There was an air of indomitable pluck, sometimes something approaching
impudence in his manner, when he looked out on the immense throngs which
surged and struggled before him. Lincoln was modest, but always
self-possessed, with no self-consciousness, his whole mind evidently
absorbed in his great theme, always candid, truthful, cool, logical,
accurate; at times, inspired by his subject, rising to great dignity and
wonderful power. The impression made by Douglas, upon a stranger who saw
him for the first time on the platform, would be--"that is a bold,
audacious, ready debater, an ugly opponent." Of Lincoln--"There is a
candid, truthful, sincere man, who, whether right or wrong, believes he
is right." Lincoln argued the side of freedom, with the most thorough
conviction that on its triumph depended the fate of the Republic. An
idea of the impression made by Lincoln in these discussions may be
inferred from a remark made by a plain old Quaker, who, at the close of
the Ottawa debate, said: "Friend, doubtless God _Almighty might_ have
made an honester man than Abe Lincoln, but doubtless he never did." It
is curious that the cause of freedom was plead by a Kentuckian, and that
of slavery by a native of Vermont. Forgetful of the ancestral hatred of
slavery to which he had been born, Douglas had, by marriage, become a
slave-holder. Lincoln had one great advantage over his antagonist--he
was always good-humored; while Douglas sometimes lost his temper,
Lincoln never lost his.
The great champions in these debates, and their discussions, have passed
into history, and the world has ratified the popular verdict of the
day--that Lincoln was the victor. It should be remembered, in justice to
the intellectual power of Douglas, that Lincoln spoke for liberty, and
he was the organ of a new and vigorous party, with a full consciousness
of being in the right. Douglas was looking to the presidency as well as
the senatorship, and must keep one eye on the slave-holder and the other
on the citizens of Illinois.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account