Sketches from the history of medicine, ancient and modern: An oration delivered before the Hunterian SocietySaunders, W. Sedgwick (William Sedgwick)
History
Sketches from the history of medicine, ancient and modern: An oration delivered before the Hunterian Society
Saunders, W. Sedgwick (William Sedgwick)
Medicine -- History; Speeches, addresses, etc., English
The Egyptians believed that so long as the human body could be saved
from putrefaction or decay, the soul of that body continued in
existence; and from this feeling arose the custom of embalming, so
common in remote ages. The embalmer was, in a certain sense, a _sacred_
functionary; nevertheless, it was the fashion to make a show of
resistance, when he began his operation, in order to mark the innate
horror of any, however necessary, profanation of the dead body.
Herodotus relates that in Egypt the mummy embalmers made the incision in
the side of the corpse with a sharp æthiopic stone. Of these stones two
varieties have been found in the tombs in Egypt, both of chipped flint,
and very neatly made. One kind is like a very small cleaver; the other
has more of the character of a lancet. The account given by Diodorus
Siculus of the resistance offered to the embalmer is, as follows:—“And
first, the body being laid on the ground, he who is called the scribe
marks on its left side how far the incision is to be made; then the
so-called slitter (paraschistes) having an æthiopic stone, and cutting
the flesh as far as the law allows, instantly runs off, the bystanders
pursuing him, and pelting him with stones, cursing him, and, as it were,
turning the horror of the deed upon him, for he who hurts a citizen is
held worthy of abhorrence.”[8] Immediately after death the corpse was
put into the hands of the embalmer, who in the presence of the friends
of the deceased, made an incision into the left side, as above
described, through which he extracted all the intestines, leaving the
heart and kidneys; the intestines were then washed in palm wine, and a
solution of astringent gums. The _brain_ was removed through the
nostrils by means of a hooked instrument, contrived for the purpose, and
the cavity filled with aromatic oils. The body was now anointed with
spice-oils and balsamic gums (frankincense being prohibited), and
allowed to remain for thirty days, after which it was immersed in a
solution of nitre for from forty to seventy days (the latter being the
extreme limit allowed); it was then enveloped in aromatised cere-cloths,
and all being ready, consigned to the coffin, on which were painted
emblems indicative of the condition of the deceased. The process is said
to have cost £300 of our money, and was, of course, only applicable to
the rich. The fee for embalmment alone, varied from a _Talent_ (which
has been estimated by some as equivalent to £193 15s., and by others to
£243 15s. of our present money) to a _Mina_, in value about £3 4s. 7d.
-----
Footnote 8:
Taken from E. B. Tylor—“Early History of Mankind,” p. 217.
-----
The embalmment of the middle classes was, in some degree, regulated by
their means; the simplest form being, the destruction of the intestines
with strong oil of tar, and after their removal soaking the body in a
strong solution of nitre for a period not exceeding seventy days.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account