Slavery in Pennsylvania: A Dissertation Submitted to the Board of University Studies of the Johns Hopkins University in Conformity with the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, 1910 — John Shaqi
Slavery in Pennsylvania: A Dissertation Submitted to the Board of University Studies of the Johns Hopkins University in Conformity with the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, 1910Turner, Edward Raymond
History
Slavery in Pennsylvania: A Dissertation Submitted to the Board of University Studies of the Johns Hopkins University in Conformity with the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, 1910
[22] Smith, _History of Delaware County_, 261; Peter Kalm, _Travels
into North America_, etc., (1748), I, 391.
[23] _Col. Rec._, VII, 37, 38.
[24] _Stat. at L._, VI, 104-110; _Votes and Proceedings_, 1761,
pp. 25, 29, 33, 38, 39, 40, 41, 52, 55, 63; _Col. Rec._,
VIII, 575, 576. "The Petition of Divers Merchants of the City
of Philadelphia, To The Honble James Hamilton Esqr. Lieut.
Governor of the Province of Pennsylvania, Humbly Sheweth, That
We the Subscribers ... have seen for some time past, the many
inconveniencys the Inhabitants have suffer'd, for want of
Labourers, and Artificers, by Numbers being Inlisted for His
Majestys Service and near a total stop to the importation of
German and other white Servants, have for some time encouraged
the importation of Negros, ... that an advantage may be
gain'd by the Introduction of Slaves, w^ch will likewise be
a means of reduceing the exorbitant Price of Labour, and in
all Probability bring our staple Commoditys to their usual
Prices." MS. Provincial Papers, XXV, March 1, 1761.
[25] _Stat. at L._, VII, 158, 159; VIII, 330-332; _Col. Rec._, IX,
400, 401, 443, ff.; X, 72, 77. The Board of Trade Journals,
LXXXII, 47, (May 5, 1774), say that their lordships had
some discourse with Dr. Franklin "upon the objections ...
to ... _imposing Duties amounting to a prohibition upon the
Importation of Negroes_."
[26] _Cf._ MS. Provincial Papers, XXXII, January, 1775.
[27] _Stat. at L._, X, 72, 73. It was forbidden by implication
rather than specific regulation. It had been foreseen that an
act for gradual abolition entailed stopping the importation of
negroes. _Pa. Packet_, Nov. 28, 1778; _1 Pa. Arch._, VII, 79.
[28] Professor E. P. Cheyney in an article written some years ago
("The Condition of Labor in Early Pennsylvania, I. Slavery,"
in _The Manufacturer_, Feb. 2, 1891, p. 8) considers
these laws to have been restrictive in purpose, and gives
three causes for their passage, in the following order of
importance: (a) dread of slave insurrections, (b) opposition
of the free laboring classes to slave competition, (c)
conscientious objections. I cannot think that this is correct.
(a) seems to have been the impelling motive only in connection
with the law of 1712, and seems rarely to have been thought
of. It was urged in 1740, 1741, and 1742, when efforts were
being made to pass a militia law in Pennsylvania, but it
attracted little attention. _Cf._ MS. Board of Trade Papers,
Prop., XV, T: 54, 57, 60.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account