If the original plan were now followed, this is about what would
happen: After the presidential election in November the people and the
newspapers would be discussing the probable attitude of the electors,
wondering whom they would choose and making various suggestions to
them. Some electors would be announcing their preferences; others
would be keeping silent. With great interest we should await the
meetings of the electors in January; the newspaper reporters would
crowd outside the door to gain the first inkling of their decisions in
each state; the returns would come in one by one from the forty-eight
state capitals and would be figured up with breathless interest. But
what actually does happen is very different from this. On the evening
of the presidential election the fight is all over. Nobody knows, and
nobody cares who the electors are. We only know that a majority of
them will vote for the Republican or for the Democratic candidate when
the time comes. In January they meet, almost unnoticed, cast their
votes as a matter of form, and get a small paragraph somewhere on the
inside pages of the newspapers.
Footnote 125:
See p. 158.
Footnote 126:
The House votes by states; the Senate by individual members. See
Amendment XII. In 1800 there was a tie, Thomas Jefferson and Aaron
Burr, each having an equal number of votes. The House of
Representatives decided the tie by electing Jefferson. Then the
Twelfth Amendment was adopted. In 1824 no candidate received a
majority, and on this occasion the House chose John Quincy Adams as
President. The system worked thereafter without mishap for over fifty
years, but in 1876 there was a serious muddle because twenty-two
electoral voters were in dispute, namely, the votes of Oregon,
Louisiana, South Carolina, and Florida. From each of these states two
sets of electors claimed to have been chosen. The controversy was
decided by a special commission of fifteen members, five from the
Senate, five from the House, and five from the Supreme Court. By a
vote of 8 to 7 this commission decided in favor of Rutherford B. Hayes
and he became President.
Footnote 127:
In the Republican national convention of 1920, for example, General
Leonard Wood and Governor Lowden polled the largest number of votes on
the first ballot. Senator Hiram Johnson of California was third and
Senator Harding of Ohio was fourth. But neither of the two leading
candidates could obtain a majority although ballot after ballot was
taken. Finally, when the delegates were becoming tired and impatient,
some of their leaders came together and agreed to unite on Senator
Harding. They advised their supporters to swing over to him and on a
subsequent ballot he was nominated.
Footnote 128:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account