Social life in England, 1750-1850Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
History
Social life in England, 1750-1850
Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
England -- Social life and customs -- 18th century; England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
In Trollope’s novels we have English life, especially well drawn; and
though many scenes are laid in London, his characters always gravitate
back to the country whence they derive their influence and prestige.
It is not my intention to elaborate more than one side of this very
versatile and copious writer. His political novels, for example, are
well worth studying, especially “Phineas Finn.” In “The Bertrams”
we have an excellent picture of Oxford life in the opening chapter.
Personal experience gave Trollope unusual insight into the characters
of the government officials of his time. He was wonderfully quick at
seizing on types hitherto unknown in English society who were gradually
becoming forces in the world. Even as a writer on sport he deserves
a place. For what can be better than his description of the young,
popular, able clergyman in “Framley Parsonage,” whose very success
leads him into some very difficult situations? I need not remind you,
for I find he is widely read in this country, of his treatment of
social gatherings in great houses like that of the Duke of Omnium.
All I intend to do is to ask you to examine his clerical types and,
perhaps, to offer some explanations which may be useful.
The state of things we read of in such books as “The Warden” and
“Barchester Towers” has almost, but not quite, disappeared, and I
confess that, although I think I understand it, I find a difficulty in
making it clear to you. The initial problem is to explain why life in
a cathedral city is often rural rather than town life. In the first
place the word “city” in England used to be applied only to places
where there was a cathedral. Ely, though still a town of some 8000
people, is always spoken of as a “city” and so are Llandaff and St.
David’s, which are little more than villages; and, till very recently,
Liverpool and Birmingham were styled “towns.” Leicester, with some
300,000 inhabitants, is still, I believe, technically a “town.” The
older cathedrals are in fact generally in small places which were once
very important “cities,” but have been outstripped by what then were
little better than hamlets, but have long since become great centres
of population. Such are Canterbury, Chichester, Salisbury, Wells, Ely,
and Lichfield. Barchester was emphatically a country town, dominated by
the landowners in the vicinity; and the clergy around it were a rural
priesthood. The society which was centred in any cathedral was and
still is unlike anything else in the world. In the middle ages a great
cathedral, like Salisbury or Lincoln, was designed for a semi-monastic
rather than congregational worship. It was served by a community of
priests, called “canons” because they observed a “canon,” or rule
of life. Joined with these was a veritable army of inferior priests,
singers and ministers, all under the control of the dean, who presided
over the cathedral, as the bishop over the diocese. This vast and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account