In a similar way any form of human life, a group, institution, or idea,
has a character, a correlation of complex tendencies, a _Motiv_, genius,
soul or whatever you may choose to call it, which is the outcome of its
past history and works on to new issues in the present situation. These
things are very little understood. How a language will behave when it
has new forms of life to interpret will depend, we understand, upon its
“genius,” its historical organism of tendencies, but I presume the
operation of this is seldom known in advance. And likewise with our
country as it lives in the minds of the people, with our system of ideas
about God and the church, or about plants and animals. These are real
forms of life, intricate, fascinating, momentous, sure to behave in
remarkable ways, but our understanding of this branch of natural history
is very limited. The popular impression that nothing important can take
place in human life without the human will being at the bottom of it is
an illusion as complete as the old view that the universe revolved about
our planet.
Here is an example from Ruskin of the working of two styles of
architecture in contact with each other. He says that the history of the
early Venetian Gothic is “the history of the struggle of the Byzantine
manner with a contemporary style [Gothic] quite as perfectly organized
as itself, and far more energetic. And this struggle is exhibited partly
in the gradual change of the Byzantine architecture into other forms,
and partly by isolated examples of genuine Gothic taken prisoner, as it
were, in the contest; or rather entangled among the enemy’s forces, and
maintaining their ground till their friends came up to sustain them.”
The reality of such struggles and adaptations cannot be gainsaid by any
one acquainted with the history of art, nor the fact that they are the
outworking of complex antecedent tendencies. But I suppose that all the
individual builder perceived of this conflict was that men from the
north were making window-mouldings and other details in new forms which
he could use, if they pleased him, instead of other forms to which he
had been accustomed. Of either style as an organic whole with more or
less energy he probably knew nothing. But they were there, just as real
and active as two contending armies.[1]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account