Some religious and moral teachings of Al-Ghazzali : $b Being brief extracts from his Ihya-u-Ulum-id-din — John Shaqi
Some religious and moral teachings of Al-Ghazzali : $b Being brief extracts from his Ihya-u-Ulum-id-dinGhazzali
Islamic
Some religious and moral teachings of Al-Ghazzali : $b Being brief extracts from his Ihya-u-Ulum-id-din
Ghazzali
Islamic ethics -- Early works to 1800
The kernel is undoubtedly the desired object, but it contains some
substance which is removed when oil is being pressed out. Similarly the
conception of an efficient final cause is the aim and object of the
devotees, but is inferior to the vision of the all-pervading Holy One,
because the conception of causality involves duality.
But the objection may be urged: How can we ignore the diversities and
multiplicities of the universe? Man has hands and feet, bones and blood,
heart and soul,—all distinct—yet he is one individual. When we are
thinking of a dear old friend and suddenly he stands before us, we do not
think of any multiplicity of his bodily organs, but are delighted to see
him. The simile, though not quite appropriate is suggestive, especially
for beginners. When they reach that stage they will themselves see its
truth. Words fail to express the beatitude of that highest stage. It can
be enjoyed, but not described.[75]
Let us consider the nature of the third stage. Man finds that God alone
is the prime cause of everything. The world, its objects, life, death,
happiness, misery, all have their source in his omnipotence. None is
associated with Him in this. When man comes to recognise this, he has no
fear of anything, but puts his trust in God alone. But Satan tempts him
by misrepresenting the agencies of the inorganic and organic worlds as
potent factors independent in the shaping of his destiny.
Think first of the inorganic world. Man thinks that crops depend on
rain descending from clouds, and that clouds gather together owing to
normal climatic conditions. Similarly his sailing on the sea depends
on favourable winds. Without doubt, these are immediate causes, but
they are not independent. Man who in the hour of need calls for God’s
mysterious help, forgets Him and turns to external causes as soon as he
finds himself safe and sound. “So, when they ride in ships, they call
upon Allah, being sincerely obedient to Him, but when he brings them safe
to land, they associate others with Him. Thus they become ungrateful
for what we have given them, so they might enjoy: but they shall soon
know”.[76] If a culprit, whose death sentence is revoked by the king,
looks to the pen as his deliverer, will it not be sheer ignorance and
ingratitude? Surely, the sun, the moon, the stars, the clouds, in fact,
the whole universe is like a pen in the hand of an omnipotent dictator.
When this kind of belief takes hold of the mind, Satan is disappointed
in covertly tempting man, and uses subtle means, insinuating thus:
“Do you not see that the king has full power either to kill or favour
you, and though the pen, in the above simile, is not your deliverer,
the writer certainly is”? As this sort of reflection led to the vexed
question of free will, we have dealt with it already at some length.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account