Something about sugar : $b Its history, growth, manufacture and distributionRolph, George M. (George Morrison)
History
Something about sugar : $b Its history, growth, manufacture and distribution
Rolph, George M. (George Morrison)
Sugar
A certain planter found that the amount of sugar obtained from his cane
was decreasing yearly, though he could see no good reason for it. The
land looked right; he ploughed deeply, harrowed well, kept the weeds
down, gave the cane plenty of water, could find no reason to complain
of climatic conditions, but still did not get satisfactory results.
Finally the head of the experimental station was consulted and an
agricultural chemist was sent to the plantation. This chemist, after
careful investigation, took samples of the soil from various parts of
the land; these were analyzed and the source of the trouble was found to
be the lack of potash. Just here it may be explained that when the same
crop is taken from the land many years in succession, without adequate
fertilization, some of the essential properties of the soil become
exhausted. Speaking generally, these are lime, soda, potash, phosphates
and nitrogen. In this particular instance, as has been said, the land
had been gradually drained of its potash. The experimental station
recommended the planter to scatter a certain fertilizer over his fields.
This advice was followed and the next crop showed remarkable improvement,
the yield of cane and sugar per acre being greater than ever before.
At one time the sugar industry of the Hawaiian islands was threatened
with annihilation by a little insect called the “leaf-hopper.” The harm
done by this pest was so enormous that one plantation having an average
yearly crop of 19,000 tons was so severely affected that the yield
dropped from 19,000 to 12,000, and then to 3000 tons in three successive
crops. All the plantations on the islands suffered to a greater or lesser
extent, and the entire sugar industry of Hawaii was jeopardized.
The hoppers punctured the stalks and leaves of the young cane, and in the
holes thus formed laid their eggs by thousands. When the young hoppers
hatched out, they fed on the juices in the stalk and in the leaves,
thus destroying the leaves and depriving the cane of its protection and
principal means of absorbing nourishment from the air.
As soon as the leaf-hopper by its ravages made itself known in the
islands, the entomologists were consulted, and they were confronted
with the task of studying the life and habits of the hopper for the
purpose of finding, if possible, some other insects that would attack
and exterminate it. It is well known to entomologists that every insect
pest has natural enemies; the vital question in this case was—what were
the natural enemies of the leaf-hopper and where were they to be found?
Obviously, too, the problem was to discover insectivorous enemies that
would not themselves attack the cane after they had destroyed the hopper.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account