Sources of the Synoptic GospelsPatton, Carl S. (Carl Safford)
Religion
Sources of the Synoptic Gospels
Patton, Carl S. (Carl Safford)
Bible. Gospels -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
Matthew adds to Mark's account the conversation in which John objects to
baptizing Jesus, and Jesus quiets his scruples (Mt iii, 14-15). This
reflects the later time, when the superiority of Jesus to John had been
historically demonstrated, and when the baptism might have given offense
by seeming to imply a need of forgiveness. The item approaches the point
of view of the similar addition in the Fourth Gospel. Matthew, who has
added this item here, is the only evangelist who says that John's baptism
was εἰς μετάνοιαν (iii, 11). Matthew's added conversation appears, still
more elaborated, in the Gospel of the Hebrews. Luke (iii, 21) adds that
Jesus was praying during his baptism, which may be an accommodation to the
custom of the early church. Mark says the voice from the sky was addressed
to Jesus; Matthew represents it as addressed to the crowd, perhaps to give
more public honor to Jesus. The Gospel of the Ebionites adds to Mark's "in
thee I am well pleased," the quotation from the Psalms, "this day have I
begotten thee"; and certain MSS contain the same words in the text of
Luke, omitting "in thee I am well pleased." These variations show the
freedom of the early tradition, but its unanimity in the idea that the
baptism was Jesus' messianic consecration. Matthew and Luke replace Mark's
σχιζομένους, a word not elsewhere found, with a word common in such
connections.
THE CALLING OF THE FIRST DISCIPLES
(Mk i, 16-20; Mt iv, 18-22; Lk v, 1-11)
Luke postpones this account, and in connection with it gives the story of
the miraculous draft of fishes, unknown to Mark and Matthew. The reason is
not apparent, especially since the transposition involves Luke in some
anachronisms. Matthew follows Mark's account closely,[22] retaining even
the parenthetical and appended explanation in vs. 16. He omits Mark's
words, "with the hired men," perhaps because of his general tendency
toward condensation, perhaps because the departure of James and John from
their father is rendered less critical by Mark's mention of the hired men.
JESUS IN THE SYNAGOGUE AT CAPERNAUM
(Mk i, 21-28; Mt vii, 28-29; Lk iv, 31-37)
Luke omits "and not as the scribes," because his readers would not
understand the allusion. He replaces Mark's awkward phrase ἐν πνεύματι
ἀκαθάρτῳ by the good Greek phrase ἔχων πνεῦμα δαιμονίου ἀκαθάρτου. He
omits Mark's mention of Galilee at the end of his account, because he has
inserted it at the beginning. Matthew's omission of the whole story may be
controlled by his unwillingness, elsewhere manifested, to represent the
demons as recognizing Jesus as the Messiah.
THE HEALING OF PETER'S MOTHER-IN-LAW
(Mk i, 29-31; Mt viii, 14-15; Lk iv, 38-39)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account