Special talents and defects : $b Their significance for education — John Shaqi
Special talents and defects : $b Their significance for educationHollingworth, Leta Stetter
Science
Special talents and defects : $b Their significance for education
Hollingworth, Leta Stetter
Educational psychology; Educational tests and measurements; Exceptional children
The methods of quantitative measurement used to study the constitution
of mental abilities, or functions, as related to each other, are chiefly
those of correlation—simple correlation, multiple correlation, and
partial correlation.
It is not within the scope of the present volume to give consideration
to these methods as such. Highly technical instruction in the theory and
practice of measurement is necessary for complete understanding of them.
The results may be comprehended for our purposes, without complete
knowledge of the methods. Much of the evidence we now have in the matter
of relationships among mental functions has been obtained by the method
of simple correlation. A brief exposition of how a relationship is
established between two variable functions within a group, by simple
correlation, will suffice to give a general understanding of the term
_coefficient of correlation_, which is used here, and which frequently
appears in modern texts of educational psychology. The interpretation of
coefficients of correlation should not, however, be undertaken
independently without full knowledge, as competent interpretation for
practical purposes must take into account all the conditions under which
they have been derived.
Below are listed fourteen school children, each of whom has been
measured in each of two mental functions: (1) mental age, determined by
a standard scale for measuring general intelligence (Stanford-Binet),
and (2) spelling ability, as measured by a standard spelling scale
(Ayres’ scale). These children were selected for study, because they
appeared to be characterized by special discrepancy between the two
functions.
We wish now to know whether and to what extent the child who falls high
in the distribution of mental ages also falls high in the distribution
of spelling ability. According to the formula which is most useful in
this case,[1] we arrange these pupils in their order of merit for one of
the functions measured, _e.g._ for mental age. We then find the rank for
each, within the group, in the second function, which is here spelling
ability. The difference in rank between the paired functions is then
found for each pupil, and the correlation formula is applied.[2]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account