Speeches at the Constitutional Convention: With the Right of Suffrage Passed by the Constitutional ConventionSmalls, Robert
History
Speeches at the Constitutional Convention: With the Right of Suffrage Passed by the Constitutional Convention
Smalls, Robert
African Americans -- Politics and government; African Americans -- Suffrage; South Carolina. Constitutional Convention (1895)
The Negroes are paying taxes in the South on $263,000,000 worth of
property. In South Carolina, according to the census, the Negroes pay
tax on $12,500,000 worth of property. That was in 1890. You voted down
without discussion merely to lay on the table, a proposition for a
simple property and educational qualification. What do you want? You
tried the infamous eight-box and registration laws until they were
worn to such a thinness that they could stand neither the test of the
law nor of public opinion. In behalf of the 600,000 Negroes in the
State and the 132,000 Negro voters all that I demand is that a fair
and honest election law be passed. We care not what the qualifications
imposed are: all that we ask is that they be fair and honest and
honorable, and with these provisos we will stand or fall by it. You
have 102,000 white men over 21 years of age; 13,000 of these cannot
read nor write. You dare not disfranchise them; and you know that the
man who proposes it will never be elected to another office in the
State of South Carolina. But whatever Mr. Tillman can do, he can make
nothing worse than the infamous eight-box law, and I have no praise
for the Conservatives, for they gave the people that law. Fifty-eight
thousand Negroes cannot read nor write. This leaves a majority of
14,000 white men who can read and write over the same class of Negroes
in this State. We are willing to accept a scheme that provides that no
man who cannot read nor write can vote, if you dare pass it. How can
you expect an ordinary man to “understand and explain” any section of
the Constitution, to correspond to the interpretation put upon it by
the manager of election, when by a very recent decision of the Supreme
Court, composed of the most learned men in the State, two of them put
one construction upon a section, and the other Justice put an entirely
different construction upon it. To embody such a provision in the
election law would be to mean that every white man would interpret
it aright and every Negro would interpret it wrong. I appeal to the
gentleman from Edgefield to realize that he is not making a law for
one set of men. Some morning you may wake up to find that the bone
and sinew of your country is gone. The Negro is needed in the cotton
fields and in the low country rice fields, and if you impose too
hard conditions upon the Negro in this State there will be nothing
else for him to do but to leave. What then will you do about your
phosphate works? No one but a Negro can work them: the mines that pay
the interest on your State debt. I tell you the Negro is the bone and
sinew of your country and you cannot do without him. I do not believe
you want to get rid of the Negro, else why did you impose a high tax on
immigration agents who might come here to get him to leave?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account