Sticks and Stones: A Study of American Architecture and CivilizationMumford, Lewis
History
Sticks and Stones: A Study of American Architecture and Civilization
Mumford, Lewis
Architecture -- United States
“And should you in the contest fall, remember with old Homer--
‘Such honours Ilion to her hero paid,
And peaceful slept the mighty Hector’s shade.’
“Allow me now to close in one of Scott’s beautiful strains:
‘Charge, Chester, charge! On, Stanley, on!
Were the last words of Marmion.’”
_That_ was American architecture between 1820 and the Civil War--a
collection of tags, thrown at random against a building. Architectural
forms were brought together by a mere juxtaposition of materials,
held in place by neither imagination nor logic. There are a number
of honorable exceptions to this rule, for architects like Renwick,
who designed St. Patrick’s Cathedral, and Upjohn, who built Trinity
Church, had a more sincere understanding of the conventional task; and
by any standard of esthetic decency the old Gothic building of New
York University, on Washington Square, was a far finer structure than
the bulky office building that has taken its place. Nevertheless, this
saving remnant does not alter the character of the great mass of work,
any more than the occasionally excellent cast-iron balconies, brought
over from the London of the Regency, alter the depressing character
of the great mass of domestic building. In elevation and interior
treatment, these ante-bellum buildings were all what-nots. Souvenirs
of architecture, their forms dimly recall the monuments of the past
without in any sense taking their place.
To tell the truth, a pall had fallen over the industrial city:
contemporary writers in the ’forties and ’fifties speak of the
filth and smoke, and without doubt the chocolate brownstone front
was introduced as a measure of protective coloration. In this dingy
environment, men turned to nature as a refuge against the soiled
and bedraggled works of man’s creation; and as the creeping factory
and railroad train removed Nature farther from their doors, the park
was introduced as a more convenient means of escape. The congested
capitals of Europe had already learnt this lesson; traveled Americans,
like William Cullen Bryant, brought it home; and Central Park, planned
in 1853, was the first of the great landscape parks to serve as a
people’s pleasance. Conceived in contrast to the deflowered landscape
and the muddled city, the park alone re-created the traditions of
civilization--of man naturalized, and therefore at home, of nature
humanized, and therefore enriched. And even today our parks are what
our cities should be, and are not.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account