Straws and prayer-books; dizain des diversionsCabell, James Branch
Philosophy
Straws and prayer-books; dizain des diversions
Cabell, James Branch
Authorship
"Well--!" I explained: and I went on, "I mean, of course, that is,
after I had given the matter real consideration--" Then I summed it all
up even more completely. "But, come now, Charteris! you, as a writer
yourself, know how these submitted notions by and by come back from
the cellar of what we--well, as one might say, fraudulently--term the
subconscious; and come back either transmuted into something quite
different or else marked Not Available for Our Present Needs."
He shook his head. "In the fidgeting face of such tergiversation I can
but observe that, really, of all things! For, when one considers the
persons whom you have elected to give a whole book to, civility must
seek refuge in aposiopesis. Me, look you, me, you have passed over in
favor of a moonstruck Kennaston and of that fat little Woods widow!"
"The Author," I pleaded, "does not customarily explain why he elects to
do anything."
"None the less, I am sure I would have made a most remunerative
protagonist. My inconsistencies are amusing: my whimsies, although
decorous, are flavorsome: my morals are, if not exactly beyond
reproach--"
"Beyond hope, anyway," I suggested.
"--And, in short, I am inclined to think that, here again, the Author
does not quite understand just what he is about."
"Upon my word," said I, "you touch a truth--"
"Each has his métier," the little man admitted, modestly. "The flea
leaps well, most senators carry their liquor well, whereas the clergy,
one deduces from the numerousness of their children--"
§ 2
"I mean," I interrupted, "that once you talked to me all through one
fine spring night. It was about Romance you talked--"
"I remember," Charteris stated, with a grin. "I can well remember how,
in that terrible dawn, after all my lovely rhetoric, you thought I had
been explaining how books ought to be written."
"Well, I do not think that now. I incline, rather, to think you were
talking about man's attitude toward life and the universe. I am sure,
though, that in all your speaking of books you left unsettled the
question you raised a moment since, as to what the Author is about? For
what reason, in fine, and with what reward in view, does any author
write his books?"
"I voiced for you most plainly and mellifluously the principles of his
economy--"
"Yes: I remember your high observations as to Villon and Marlowe.
The artist, you argued, is unwilling to be wasted; and he alone
manages--sometimes--to perpetuate himself where everybody else
perishes. You were quite eloquent about the artist's immortality.
Only, I remember too that, toward the end, you admitted a considerable
distinction. In art, you cried, it may so happen that the thing which
a man makes may endure to be misunderstood and gabbled over, but it
is not the man himself. We retain--I am still paying you the handsome
tribute of exact quotation,--we retain the _Iliad_, but oblivion
has swallowed Homer so deep that many question if he ever existed at
all."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account